Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

[whodeycin85]

That makes no sense.

When your the type that laps up MSM media, then it wouldn't make sense.

 

[OrangeBoro]

Idiots.

Fact check: Clip of Biden taken out of context to portray him as plotting a voter fraud scheme

From the article “likely meaning….” So Reuters is now trying to interpret what politicians mean? I wonder if they would have given Trump the same grace? Of course not. You are the idiot comrade I’m taking your president at his word

 

[OrangeBoro]

So he said what he said. No edit and it was taken out of context.

He roamed the internet for an hour and the best he could come up with was Reuters telling what they think he meant

 

[C-south]

LOL. No chance that he was joking on Jimmy Kimmel Live! is there? Good lord. LOL.

Dementia Joe isn’t smart enough to be sarcastic.

 

[BowlBrother85]

He roamed the internet for an hour and the best he could come up with was Reuters telling what they think he meant

I have posted articles which de-bunked the assertions made from that video before ... There are a dozen such articles to choose from. I don't remember if it was in response to you ... but it wouldn't surprise me. You repeat lies, which have already been de-bunked.

 

[C-south]

I have posted articles which de-bunked the assertions made from that video before ... There are a dozen such articles to choose from. I don't remember if it was in response to you ... but it wouldn't surprise me. You repeat lies, which have already been de-bunked.

You are as much of an emotional wreck as luther, lg, etc.

 

[NCFisher]

You’re saying that elected officials and bureaucrats should be able to sue people who criticize them?

I didn't imply it or even mention criticism, but specified libel/slander.

 

[whodeycin85]

I have posted articles which de-bunked the assertions made from that video before ... There are a dozen such articles to choose from. I don't remember if it was in response to you ... but it wouldn't surprise me. You repeat lies, which have already been de-bunked.

Any of those articles have actual proof of what he meant and not a fact check opinion or interpretation?

 

[whodeycin85]

You’re saying that elected officials and bureaucrats should be able to sue people who criticize them?

Do you think that a "news" company should be held responsible for probable false stories that it provides?

 

[NCFisher]

You are defending Fox News by calling other media organizations "slanderous" ???

You have zero sense of self-awareness. Nada. Zip. Zilch.

Oh, you got me.
Except...I clearly didn't defend Fox but stated conservatives should also hold media accountable for libel/slander, and that government should not be exempt from these laws, either.

You have zero comprehension. Nada. Zip. Zilch.

 

[NCFisher]

You actually do ... especially when one of the people involved has been caught lying about the purpose of the meeting. Why did Trump Jr. lie about the purpose of the meeting?

No you don't and whether he lied or not - about something that is not a crime, nor while under sworn testimony - you don't appoint a SC...good grief, man.
The answer to your question is, it doesn't matter.

 

[BowlBrother85]

You are as much of an emotional wreck as luther, lg, etc.

^^^^ Thinks Trump won the election, but it's other people who are emotional wrecks.

 

[OrangeBoro]

I have posted articles which de-bunked the assertions made from that video before ... There are a dozen such articles to choose from. I don't remember if it was in response to you ... but it wouldn't surprise me. You repeat lies, which have already been de-bunked.

So what’s your explanation for what your president said? I played his words

 

[BowlBrother85]

No you don't and whether he lied or not - about something that is not a crime, nor while under sworn testimony - you don't appoint a SC...good grief, man.
The answer to your question is, it doesn't matter.

It does matter that the Trumps lied about that meeting. It understandably raised suspicions.

 

[BowlBrother85]

So what’s your explanation for what your president said? I played his words

I posted the fact-check in Reuters. That's the explanation. I can post several other fact-checks if you want. They all say pretty much the same thing.

 

[Orangeburst]

No you don't and whether he lied or not - about something that is not a crime, nor while under sworn testimony - you don't appoint a SC...good grief, man.
The answer to your question is, it doesn't matter.

Remember when Schumer made that IC comment on TV? Should send chills up anyones spine. And then Trump visited CIA HQ in early days. Bizarre.

 

[OrangeBoro]

I posted the fact-check in Reuters. That's the explanation. I can post several other fact-checks if you want. They all say pretty much the same thing.

No your explanation not some far left wing site, ehh never mind you will just repeat what they wrote.

 

[NCFisher]

It does matter that the Trumps lied about that meeting. It understandably raised suspicions.

It can raise suspicions to the suspicious in perpetuity. Uunless under oath and about a ***** crime, you don't even hand this to a slip and fall guy, forget about your apoplectic escalation to a SC.

 

[RockyTop85]

I didn't imply it or even mention criticism, but specified libel/slander.

They can already do that. Which is why it absolutely implies criticism to say they should be able to do more.

 

[NCFisher]

Remember when Schumer made that IC comment on TV? Should send chills up anyones spine. And then Trump visited CIA HQ in early days. Bizarre.

It's spine-chilling that none of these people will go to prison who participated in a known hoax, all along, and didn't care about the bleeding wounds they left on this nation. Things have been broken that I don't think can be glued back together.

 

[C-south]

^^^^ Thinks Trump won the election, but it's other people who are emotional wrecks.

I haven’t mentioned trump one time.

 

[Orangeburst]

It's spine-chilling that none of these people will go to prison who participated in a known hoax, all along, and didn't care about the bleeding wounds they left on this nation. Things have been broken that I don't think can be glued back together.

I said it for years. A Bridge too Far and the end of the Republic.
If any politician or bureaucrat of either party has committed real crimes, prosecute them. The left only cares about their party over the nations interest and will Rip it apart for power.

They have done far more damage than Putin would ever dream.

 

[OrangeBoro]

Good lord is this clown back to talking about the Trump Tower meeting? It’s like a broken record

 

[BowlBrother85]

I thought it would be nice to take a look back at Tucker Carlson's finest hour with Fox News.

TUCKER CARLSON: Democrats know they're about to get crushed

^^^^ His uncanny forecast of the 2022 mid-term elections. ^^^^

Step aside, Nostradamus. There is a new soothsayer in town

 

[Boston Vol]

I disagree ... but I'm sure there are some valid reasons for you to feel that way.

Yeah I have an IQ above room temperature. You honestly believe that an Oxford educated PhD thought the Russians were going to murder Americans by turning off their heat during the winter?