Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 45,975
- Likes
- 43,347
Yeah, because missiles were the only cost involved in this operation. I wonder how much we spent on jet fuel? It's like $25k to fly one fighter for an hour.
And that's tomahawks we no longer have for another purpose. It's not like we were playing with house money. Those are useful and we paid for them.
Yeah, because missiles were the only cost involved in this operation. I wonder how much we spent on jet fuel? It's like $25k to fly one fighter for an hour.
And that's tomahawks we no longer have for another purpose. It's not like we were playing with house money. Those are useful and we paid for them.
This argument is embarrasing. Show me the headlines bemoaning the expeditures required for this strike. It is literally the dumbest point someone could complain about concerning this decision.
Now the few remaining Trump supporters on the right have an interesting take. 60 tomahawks, yet only 20 actually hit anything of significance, but none hit the runway. This is being spun as Trump countering a false flag with a false flag. They intentionally "missed" targets in an effort to simply show force and send a message to people outside the US as well as inside.
If that is true, I'm still not liking that we are using bombings as propaganda tools. Plus, the US was not invited into Syria, no matter if it was a false flag or not.