UCLA suspends 6 for oregon game

#101
#101
Bumi said:
The offense isn't that complex. It's the rate at which plays are run that kills opposing teams.

Zone Read
Bubble Screen
Fake Bubble Screen go route

Tripple option here and there.
Click to expand...

It's not like we run 4 plays.
 
#103
#103
Smokey901 said:
I think it's safe to say Oregon will win this game. -_-
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

not sure. 1) ucla has the front 7 talent to possibly give oregon problems (assuming woods and ayres aren't suspended), 2) slick rick tends to pull a couple of games out of his arse every year, 3) no way oregon is up for the game. i'd still put it 1/5 that ucla wins (since ucla just isn't very good), but i bet they cover.
 
#104
#104
droski said:
not sure. 1) ucla has the front 7 talent to possibly give oregon problems, 2) slick rick tends to pull a couple of games out of his arse every year, 3) no way oregon is up for the game. i'd still put it 1/5 that ucla wins (since ucla just isn't very good), but i bet they cover.
Click to expand...

Dude, UCLA has no shot, and that's coming from someone who tends to worry a lot about most games. Richard Brehaut running their offense at Autzen? In the words of Keyshawn, C'mon, Man.
 
#105
#105
droski said:
not sure. 1) ucla has the front 7 talent to possibly give oregon problems (assuming woods and ayres aren't suspended), 2) slick rick tends to pull a couple of games out of his arse every year, 3) no way oregon is up for the game. i'd still put it 1/5 that ucla wins (since ucla just isn't very good), but i bet they cover.
Click to expand...

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see Oregon get taken down. But with the talent and speed they have I just don't see UCLA having a realistic shot.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#106
#106
DuckinTN said:
Dude, UCLA has no shot, and that's coming from someone who tends to worry a lot about most games. Richard Brehaut running their offense at Autzen? In the words of Keyshawn, C'mon, Man.
Click to expand...

ucla still has talent. i agree it's unlikely, but oregon hasn't faced guys upfront of moore and ayers talent. and i have no faith that oregon's d is a lock to stop any offense. they also have 10 days to prepare which is important for defending oregons unusual offense.
 
#107
#107
droski said:
you do realize you can run the same play and still have multiple options right? you dont' seem to understand your offense that well.

i really fail to see how allowing reporters to attend practice would make kelly hold back his gameplan. last time i checked the register guard wasn't reporting formations or play calling.
Click to expand...

I know, if you ever get a chance, watch the first drive of the 2nd half of Oregon at Tennessee, it shows exactly what Oregon does (even though we didn't score on that drive). Thing is, most of our plays start from the same basic formations, so you don't know what's going to happen because it all starts out looking the same. For example, depending on how the Back is lined-up, you either have a possible inside- or outside-zone run play, and the QB reading either a DT or DE, depending on the type of run. When the Back is behind the QB, it's an inside run, when he's to the side, it's an outside run. But now the Back is being motioned and misused for confusion. Add on top there are design pass plays where the back is a blocker as well from the same formations - you don't know if it's a run or a pass, so no, you generally don't know exactly what's coming.

Unless you know how to read the plays being signaled from the sidelines after studying them for a month.
 
#108
#108
droski said:
ucla still has talent. i agree it's unlikely, but oregon hasn't faced guys of moore and ayers talent. and i have no faith that oregon's d is a lock to stop any offense.
Click to expand...

For God's sake, Stanford's D pitched a shutout against UCLA, at the Rose Bowl no less.
 
#109
#109
DuckinTN said:
For God's sake, Stanford's D pitched a shutout against UCLA, at the Rose Bowl no less.
Click to expand...

stanford is a far more physical team than oregon defensively. they're problem is with teams with good team speed (which ucla does not have on offense). ucla matches up better with oregon's D.
 
#110
#110
droski said:
stanford is a far more physical team than oregon defensively. they're problem is with teams with good team speed (which ucla does not have on offense). ucla matches up better with oregon's D.
Click to expand...

I'd be willing to bet that UCLA gets no more than 250 yards of total offense.
 
#113
#113
Oregon was most certainly "in it" for Keenan Allen - and the whole gang actually - but Keenan's stepdad was not going to let him come to Eugene. And I'm a Duck fan *not* glad that we didn't end up with any of those players, so no sour grapes here.

Phil's money hasn't taken Oregon as far as it can go - not by a longshot. He's going to build a new ridiculous football ops building, and then he's going to expand Autzen - or perhaps in the reversed order. They're telling recruits about it right now. And if you think Basketball represents Phil's failure to make an impact by throwing money into the program, you're absolutely retarded. The arena is a palace, and combined with the existing facilities on this campus Oregon will be getting recruits. Oregon will be back in Pac 10 Basketball soon enough assuming Altman is a half-competent coach - and I believe we'll find out quickly that he is.

Oregon will *never* dominate California recruiting - but it doesn't need to. Oregon is in the unique position of being a school with a ridiculously well positioned "brand" nation-wide *without* historical relevance and storied tradition. We'll keep getting a few players here and there in CA, and we'll keep spreading the net wider bringing in kids from across the country who are enamored with the identity of this program, its coaches, the Eugene community, the facilities, and, yes, the uniforms.
 
#114
#114
BellottiBold said:
Oregon was most certainly "in it" for Keenan Allen - and the whole gang actually - but Keenan's stepdad was not going to let him come to Eugene. And I'm a Duck fan *not* glad that we didn't end up with any of those players, so no sour grapes here.
Click to expand...

it was between alabama and cal. this is pretty well documented. what do you mean "not glad"?
 
#115
#115
BellottiBold said:
Oregon was most certainly "in it" for Keenan Allen - and the whole gang actually - but Keenan's stepdad was not going to let him come to Eugene. And I'm a Duck fan *not* glad that we didn't end up with any of those players, so no sour grapes here.

Phil's money hasn't taken Oregon as far as it can go - not by a longshot. He's going to build a new ridiculous football ops building, and then he's going to expand Autzen - or perhaps in the reversed order. They're telling recruits about it right now. And if you think Basketball represents Phil's failure to make an impact by throwing money into the program, you're absolutely retarded. The arena is a palace, and combined with the existing facilities on this campus Oregon will be getting recruits. Oregon will be back in Pac 10 Basketball soon enough assuming Altman is a half-competent coach - and I believe we'll find out quickly that he is.

Oregon will *never* dominate California recruiting - but it doesn't need to. Oregon is in the unique position of being a school with a ridiculously well positioned "brand" nation-wide *without* historical relevance and storied tradition. We'll keep getting a few players here and there in CA, and we'll keep spreading the net wider bringing in kids from across the country who are enamored with the identity of this program, its coaches, the Eugene community, the facilities, and, yes, the uniforms.
Click to expand...

This has nothing to do with your post, but I want Oregon to flip George Farmer. USC has enough receivers.
 
#116
#116
Yes, between Bama and Cal if you ignore months and months of the recruiting saga, and only look at the time period that spans from your offer to Maynard, and signing day.
 
#117
#117
BellottiBold said:
Yes, between Bama and Cal if you ignore months and months of the recruiting saga, and only look at the time period that spans from your offer to Maynard, and signing day.
Click to expand...

:blink:

by this theory cal almost had virtually every top player in teh pac-10 since 2002. who gives a crap? why would a premier receiver go to oregon?
 
#118
#118
droski said:
:blink:

by this theory cal almost had virtually every top player in teh pac-10 since 2002. who gives a crap? why would a premier receiver go to oregon?
Click to expand...

Why would a premier WR go to Cal? Desean Jackson, who regardless of where he went to school, would have been an NFL talent?
 
#119
#119
Bumi said:
Why would a premier WR go to Cal? Desean Jackson, who regardless of where he went to school, would have been an NFL talent?
Click to expand...

i see. so cal didn't use him in ways that got him noticed by the nfl? whens the last first day receiver oregon has had?
 
#120
#120
Bumi said:
Why would a premier WR go to Cal? Desean Jackson, who regardless of where he went to school, would have been an NFL talent?
Click to expand...

He wanted to catch balls from the immortal Kevin Riley. That's the only explanation.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top