BadJerry20
Internet Super Hero
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2012
- Messages
- 65,905
- Likes
- 8,579
I still don't get why we're talking about Brock. First of all, he was the champ. Second, he had health issues.
Clint has a boxing background, and Kelvin has a wrestling base...typically boxers don't have much experience that translates. I still think Clint was the most inexperienced. Definitely among the least experienced (can you at least agree on that?). He was Jones' top pick.
Because I'm actually staying on topic. Most people saw Brock as this big scary dude, I saw him as an over hyped fighter with a weak chin, that ran when he got hit. He was pushed toward the title because of his name and ability to sell ppvs. Sure he had injuries, still doesn't negate the fact that Overeem kicked his azz back to the WWE. He was.a classic case of people buying the media hype.
I said Clint was raw and inexperienced, do you read what I say? I said I don't base off of appearance, but you keep bringing up other people that do. I said some people do but not all. Your argument makes no sense, cause I am talking about what I do not other people. You keep reaching for something that isn't there.