Uniform changes for 2013

#127
#127
I think checkerboard numbers would be a rules violation in 2013.

-from the NCAA website, rule changes for 2013 (emphasis added)-
To clarify uniform rules as follows: “Jerseys must have clearly visible, permanent Arabic numerals measuring at least 8 and 10 inches in height front and back, respectively, and be of one solid color that itself is clearly in distinct contrast with the color of the jersey, irrespective of any border around the number.” This rule goes into effect for Football Bowl Subdivision teams in 2013. Football Championship Subdivision, Division II and Division III teams will have until 2014 before the rule becomes effective.
 
#128
#128
DownTheField said:
Again, it's not the only factor. But other schools are definitely benefitting- two come to mind immediately: VT and TCU.

Now, one might say that these chumps had to do something since they have no tradition, etc. Well, I say they're showing that they can compete and will do whatever it takes to win.
Click to expand...

Your best examples are 2 teams that went 7-6 last year? And that was a 7-6 in a very weak ACC, and TCU it's really hard to say because their success came before they joined the B12.

Even still I would argue while they change, both of those teams still keep a somewhat standard look, at least compared to Oregon.

The only school I can think of that went Oregon type nuts is Maryland....and that certainly hasn't worked out well for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#130
#130
ellivhsaN said:
I think checkerboard numbers would be a rules violation in 2013.

-from the NCAA website, rule changes for 2013 (emphasis added)-
To clarify uniform rules as follows: “Jerseys must have clearly visible, permanent Arabic numerals measuring at least 8 and 10 inches in height front and back, respectively, and be of one solid color that itself is clearly in distinct contrast with the color of the jersey, irrespective of any border around the number.” This rule goes into effect for Football Bowl Subdivision teams in 2013. Football Championship Subdivision, Division II and Division III teams will have until 2014 before the rule becomes effective.
Click to expand...

The pattern is subtle enough that it complies with the new rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#131
#131
ellivhsaN said:
I think checkerboard numbers would be a rules violation in 2013.

-from the NCAA website, rule changes for 2013 (emphasis added)-
To clarify uniform rules as follows: “Jerseys must have clearly visible, permanent Arabic numerals measuring at least 8 and 10 inches in height front and back, respectively, and be of one solid color that itself is clearly in distinct contrast with the color of the jersey, irrespective of any border around the number.” This rule goes into effect for Football Bowl Subdivision teams in 2013. Football Championship Subdivision, Division II and Division III teams will have until 2014 before the rule becomes effective.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing the checkerboard would not necessarily be a different colors but the same color in a pattern. Kinda like how you can mow a yard in a design but it's still all green (sorry, best analogy I could think of)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#132
#132
DeerPark12 said:
They didn't offer us a very good contract three years ago, what's changed in your opinion?
Click to expand...

He got it from the same source that tells him Nike is definitely better than Adidas and that every football player in America wants Nike over Adidas.
 
#134
#134
Jake Tate said:
It's not a repeat since there are actually changes to talk about.

DEERPARK had some good info on the gray at Oregon, that's exciting
Click to expand...

Just referencing the tradition vs. change and Nike vs. Adidas arguments. I always enjoy a good uni debate.
 
#135
#135
VolsSportsFan said:
1) Proof they do?

2) How many times does this need to be addressed?

And again, you're really stretching it with your comparisons that Adidas is so much worse in quality than Nike. It's almost like you work for Nike.
Click to expand...

To imply there is any significant or even miniscule competitive advantage into what kind of shirt or shoes you are wearing is laughable. It all comes down to what the kids think looks "cool". All of the companies have minor variations of the same thing. As to quality, if that means how long they last, I'm sure any of the companies would give them more of whatever it is they are wearing out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#136
#136
It doesn't matter to me which company get the contract. My question is: does Nike offer every team the same contract as they offered us? If not , why would we not deserve what they offer other schools?
 
#137
#137
DownTheField said:
Uniforms certainly aren't a major factor for an athlete choosing a school. BUT they are a factor. And, as CBJ says, everything is like 4th and 1 for the championship.

Oregon is the exception that proves the rule. How many athletes around the country had Oregon on their radar 15-20 years ago?
Click to expand...


look at recruiting numbers. How much better than UT has Oregon recruited with flashy uniforms? Answer: according to Rivals over the past 4 years, there is no difference. And, that is during the worst 4 years in UT history and arguably the best in Oregon's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#141
#141
daj2576 said:
look at recruiting numbers. How much better than UT has Oregon recruited with flashy uniforms? Answer: according to Rivals over the past 4 years, there is no difference. And, that is during the worst 4 years in UT history and arguably the best in Oregon's.
Click to expand...

I'd prefer to judge what happens on the field vs. what the recruiting rankings say. So UT and Oregon are even in recruiting? Hmmm.
 
#143
#143
DP, correct me if I'm wrong, but for all those under the impression that Nike would give UT a 'good deal', isn't there a rather large control issue with Nike (to say nothing of the money and amounts of 'stuff' provided)?

Basically you can get into a situation where you either wear what they say or lose your $$$?
 
#144
#144
Boca Vol said:
I'd prefer to judge what happens on the field vs. what the recruiting rankings say. So UT and Oregon are even in recruiting? Hmmm.
Click to expand...

Go a step further before you conclude that number of wins equals playing quality opponents. Or that UTs record indicates talent has been utilized and developed correctly. Bottom line: an argument cannot be made that Oregon is recruiting better than UT because of uniforms. An argument can be made that Oregon is doing more with the same caliber of recruits, if you don't look at Oregon's competition.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#147
#147
Idk if you guys are familiar with the titans jerseys but they have "Titans" printed small above the numbers and they look great
 
#148
#148
daj2576 said:
Go a step further before you conclude that number of wins equals playing quality opponents. Or that UTs record indicates talent has been utilized and developed correctly. Bottom line: an argument cannot be made that Oregon is recruiting better than UT because of uniforms. An argument can be made that Oregon is doing more with the same caliber of recruits, if you don't look at Oregon's competition.
Click to expand...

I agree that Oregon has been getting more out of their players. Look no further than the a$$-kicking they put on UT in 2010.
 
#149
#149
VolsSportsFan said:
It wouldn't be very hard to top the clown suits Oregon likely will be wearing.
Click to expand...

Lol I never understand why so many people like plain. I would love to see some not-so-subtle changes to our uniform. I'm not so much hung up on the current look of our uniform. The only thing im attached to is the color orange.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top