Outrage over removing a passenger from a flight who refused to leave when asked? Really? That outraged you?
False narrative: He was just a doctor trying to get home to his patients. As if he was sitting there and then unexpectedly gets yanked and beaten.
Let's divide this up a bit for the sake of context. A guy pays for a ticket, boards his plane, gets in his seat and is good to go. Now somebody from the airlines says he has to leave and somebody else is getting his seat.
Ok, right now we've got serious BS. This is, IMO, where most of the outrage starts and there's nothing feigned about it...it's pure, undiluted bovine feces and basically everybody feels this way to some degree. I don't care if the guy walked out smiling and giving out hugs that scenario is garbage and it's on the airline's head.
So now we're at how it all went down and it was pretty ugly. The outrage here, and it need not be feigned, is that not only can someone do nothing wrong and have gone through the rarely less than considerable ordeal of getting oneself on a plane but now can obviously have yourself violently removed...all because the airline can't get their poo together enough to have paying customers stay on the damn plane.
I think what this guy mostly did was bring to the fore something that rather pizzes a lot of people off anyway.
Personally I'm for a volunteer lottery. If an airline overbooks (their fault, screw em) the person(s) opting to get off the plane get to choose from 5 envelopes. In these envelopes are checks (no miles/vouchers/etc, checks made out to cash) 1500, 2000, 3000, 5000 & 10000. (yes, 10K) If the airlines thinks that's too much then don't overbook.
I think this approach would have two advantages; getting people to volunteer to leave the plane would become much easier and the airlines might try to do a better job of not having to tell people that have tickets for a plane they don't, you know, actually have tickets for a plane.