Urban Myth Countdown

#26
#26
Claim: Actor Kevin Costner was caught in bed with the wife of Orioles infielder Cal Ripken, Jr. in August 1997, forcing the Orioles to cancel a game so that the distraught Ripken's consecutive-game streak would not be in jeopardy.

Cal Ripken, Jr. was allowing Kevin Costner, the actor, to stay at his house, following the wrap of "The Postman". One day, Ripken left for Camden Yards to play in a game. Somewhere between his home and the stadium, Cal realized that he had left something back at his house, and turned back to retrieve it. Upon arriving at his home, he found Kevin Costner in bed with his wife, Kelly. Cal then proceeded to beat the crap out of Costner, to the point that Costner was unable to make any publicity opportunities for a time. Cal then called the Orioles, and told them he wouldn't be coming in to play that day. Upon hearing this, the owner reminded Cal about his streak, telling him The Streak would end if he didn't play that day. Cal told him it was impossible for him to come in, so there went the streak. Reportedly, the owner told him not to worry, because he would take care of it. That night, the game was cancelled due to "electrical failure" with some lights on the field. The caller said that their was no problem with the lights, that everything else, including the hotels and restaurants that are part of Camden Yards, worked perfectly. The next day, the lights were fixed, Cal was able to play, and the streak stayed intact.

Variations: In some versions Ripken fails to appear for the day's scheduled game because he is too distraught to play; in others he misses showing up for the game because he's gone to a hospital emergency room (apparently having received worse injuries than the person he "beat the crap" out of).

Origins: On 6 September 1995, Baltimore Orioles infielder Cal Ripken, Jr. broke a record long thought to be unassailable when he played in his 2,131st consecutive baseball game, surpassing the mark of 2,130 set by Lou Gehrig back in 1939. Ripken would go on to play in a total of 2,632 straight games before finally sitting one out on 20 September 1998.

One of the most remarkable aspects of Ripken's most remarkable of streaks was that he started every game (i.e., no pinch-hitting, pinch-running, or late-inning defensive substitution appearances), voluntarily left a game before the seventh inning only four times (he was also ejected twice by umpires), and at one point played every single inning of every single game for over five years. In other words, Ripken didn't even come close to missing a game during his streak -- except, the legend above claims, for one day in August 1997, when Ripken was unable to make it to the park for that evening's scheduled game, and a mysterious malfunction in the lighting system (allegedly deliberately created by an Orioles employee) forced the cancellation of the game and thereby preserved Ripken's streak intact.

A scheduled 14 August 1997 game between the Orioles and the Seattle Mariners was cancelled due to lighting problems, but there was nothing "mysterious" about it. A ground fault interrupt kept tripping the circuit breaker each time the lights in the right-field bank were turned on, and the game's 7:35 P.M. starting time was pushed back as a crew worked on the problem. (That the businesses surrounding Camden Yards in Baltimore did not experience similar problems is not strange, as Camden Yards is on a separate portion of the city's power grid.) The crew got the bank of lights working by 8:45 P.M., but about 20 bulbs failed to illuminate, and the umpiring crew had to make the decision whether to allow the game to begin. Crew chief Al Clark finally postponed the game at 10 P.M. after determining that shadows at home plate created unsafe playing conditions, but his decision might have been different had fireballer Randy Johnson not been scheduled to start for the Mariners that evening. Given that Johnson is a left-hander who throws extremely hard, and the lighting outage occurred on the first-base side (i.e., the side on which batters would be picking up the ball as the southpaw Johnson threw towards home plate), the risk of serious injury to a batter was deemed too great to allow the game to proceed -- it was cancelled and played as part of a double-header the following day.

Whether the electrical outage was "mysterious" or not, it wasn't concocted to keep Ripken's streak alive by forcing the cancellation of a game he would otherwise have missed. News reports of the day's events prove Ripken was present at the ballpark, suited up and ready to play; both fans and reporters noted him sitting in the dugout and playing catch along the sidelines that evening. This current legend is simply a recycling of a three-year-old tale someone concocted based on a long-standing friendship between Ripken and actor Kevin Costner, some four-year-old rumors of the Ripkens' having marital difficulties, and the unusual cancellation of a game due to lighting problems.

Actor Kevin Costner and Cal Ripken, Jr. met in 1990 at a premiere of Costner's film Dances with Wolves and began what Costner described as a "burgeoning friendship." Before a game during the 1991 season, Costner took batting and fielding practice with the Orioles, played catch on the sidelines, went through stretching exercises in the outfield, and batted and took grounders with Ripken. Costner was often seen taking in Orioles games from the stands at Baltimore's Camden Yards, sometimes sitting with Ripken's wife, Kelly. In late 1997, rumors began circulating that the Ripkens had separated, Cal was staying with a teammate, and a divorce was imminent. The rumors included claims of infidelities on both sides, with the male interloper named as anyone from "an Orioles trainer" to Costner (who at the time lived about an hour from the Ripken ranch). From such rumors was the "mysterious game cancellation" legend concocted back in 1998.

The Ripkens are still married, and we have no idea what (if any) relationship existed between Kevin Costner and Kelly Ripken. When this legend was repeated by a couple of hosts on Fox Sports Radio in June 2001, an angry Costner called the show the next day to deny it and tell the hosts that if they had claimed the story was true, "I was going to take your heads off." Costner maintained that he has met Ripken's wife only twice in his life, that he has probably spent no more than 10 minutes with her altogether, and that he has never been to the Ripken home. Since Costner has been noted sitting in the stands for whole games with Kelly Ripken, his "10 minutes" and "twice in his life" claims might be underestimates, but whatever Costner's relationship with the Ripkens, he didn't make necessary some Machiavellian maneuvering on the part of the Orioles to keep Cal from missing a game.

62 Days Until Tennessee Exposes The Urban Myth!!!
 
#28
#28
Why are we in for a surprise. I have lived in Florida the past three years and I know that you cant really belive that that defense is going to be good? you really think that any of them running backs are going to do crap? if you do you are the one that is in for a surprise!
 
#29
#29
Claim: Golf courses have eighteen holes because a bottle of Scotch contains eighteen shots.

Why do full-length golf courses have 18 holes, and not 20, or 10 or an even dozen?

How many of you golfers know the answer to this one?

During a discussion among the club's membership board at St. Andrews in 1858, one of the members pointed out that it takes exactly 18 shots to polish off a fifth of Scotch. By limiting himself to only one shot of Scotch per hole, the Scot figured a round of golf was finished when the Scotch ran out.

Origins: Although this current bit of lore about soused Scots limiting themselves to one slurp at the flask per hole has its charm, it does not have history on its side. The number of holes comprising a standard golf course was not determined by the amount of Scotch in a bottle.

Golf wasn't always as regulated as it is now. Prior to standardization, early courses had any number of holes from five to twenty-four. Games similar to golf have been around since Roman times, but the game as we now know it dates approximately to 1552, when the famed St. Andrews course was constructed. (Earlier Scottish versions, however, were called "golf" even though the game itself was not at that time all it would finally become.)

Because the Old Course at St. Andrews had eighteen holes when the first commonly accepted rules of golf were formulated by the Royal & Ancient Golf Club of St. Andrews, eighteen holes became the standard.

But couldn't that number still be tied to a hip flask, you say? Not unless the bottle shrank. In the 16th century St. Andrews had eleven fairways extending from the clubhouse, linked by a progression of twelve holes. (Golfers teed off next to the hole that would be their final destination on the trip back in, and they turned around upon reaching the last hole, so the first and last holes were used only once per round.) The course was played out and back: eleven fairways out plus eleven back made for a total of twenty-two holes per round, and it brought golfers right back to the clubhouse.

In 1764, two of the original fairways were judged to be too short and were consequently combined with others. This left nine fairways, and playing them out and back formed what is now considered a standard round of eighteen holes.

So there you have it — no drunken Scots at all.

61 Days Until Tennessee Ends The Gator's Urban Myth!!
 
#30
#30
Urban will be very tough to beat.

I have my doubts about him as I think all of his rivals SHOULD but every team in the East has questions.

This is what I love about the SEC....so much uncertain, exciting football
 
#31
#31
Originally posted by GatorVille@Jul 16, 2005 10:22 PM
UF was very good before SOS.
[snapback]114999[/snapback]​


:blink: Save a couple of years in the early/mid-80's, I'm not so sure I'd call them "Very Good." The four years prior to Spurrier's tenure netted a whopping 6, 6, 7, and 7 wins. Since 1906, the Gators won nine games only SEVEN times before him.
 
#32
#32
I can't believe no one shares my confidence in predicting that TN will blowout FLA by two TD's and Leak will not finish the game. Urb and the Gators have to be the most hyped team in NCAA history. 6 wins will be stretching it for the IMPERSONURBANGATOR!
 
#33
#33
Most hyped? USC has far more hype this season. If you are talking about overhyped, there are still more teams that are more overrated than Florida, this season.
 
#34
#34
Originally posted by TBALLVOL@Jul 19, 2005 10:32 AM
I can't believe no one shares my confidence in predicting that TN will blowout FLA by two TD's and Leak will not finish the game. Urb and the Gators have to be the most hyped team in NCAA history. 6 wins will be stretching it for the IMPERSONURBANGATOR!


Please do :rocks:
 
#35
#35
Hahaha kakakaka.... I cant wait to see what you guys have to say about us (win or lose), we wont be blown out, its gonna be a close game, its gonna be a classic, and if zook can go 8-5, im very very very sure urban can go ATLEAST 9-3, no way we only win 6 games, id bet w/e you want that we win more then 6....anything.
 
#36
#36
Originally posted by GatorVille@Jul 19, 2005 3:23 PM
if zook can go 8-5, im very very very sure urban can go ATLEAST 9-3,
[snapback]115906[/snapback]​


Tough to argue with that. The talent alone at Florida is probably worth 7-8 wins no matter who is coaching.
 
#37
#37
I don't think it will be close.

I think Tennessee will blow out the Gators, but I'm not confident enough to say by how much. I also think that if (hell gets below 0 degrees, and) I am wrong, it will be a blowout the other way.
 
#38
#38
I was a little later with today's myth.....

Claim: Serena Williams announced she'd "stopped dating black guys" because "a white man is the only real choice for a successful black female."

Interview with Serena Williams

Interviewer - Ms. Williams we are all interested in your new boyfriend.

Serena : There is no new boyfriend. I stopped playing with boys when I stopped dating black guys. I have a new man in my life and yes, he's white.

Interviewer - So you prefer to date white men instead of black guys?

Serena : let's be real. If you are a successful black female you only have two choices....date outside of your race or date other successful black females.

Interviewer - Are you saying there are no successful black men to date?

Serena : Of course not but lets face it, if Oprah would date outside of her race she would be married with children now. The state of most black men is so low the only thing you can do is love them. Like a poor homeless dog. You can't expect it to protect you. You can only offer shelter and love and watch as our neighbor's pitbull protects his home and family. I, unlike Oprah, am not forced to stay within those boundaries. I was born into a new generation of black women.

Interviewer - So Oprah is being forced to date Stedman?

Serena : All I can say is when you find a successful black women who is not married and does not have children it is because they refuse to accept the two choices. Some may go as far as marriage to a black guy but they realize divorce is inevitable so they do not have children. Or they have children with one and don't marry in order to preserve their wealth and good credit. Oprah is one of many who silently protests being stuck with such poor choices by refusing to marry and reproduce but you can see how much it hurts her. She's always giving away money to children's charities. I hope she makes the choice to marry a non-black soon so she can have a child of her own.

Interviewer - But you have decided to accept the two choices?

Serena : Yes. I grew up in California around the two extremes of wealth. If I could only get myself to try the bisexual thing I would have been much happier in my relationships. Instead I dated black men. I loved many of them but they were just not suitable for marriage. Many of them were raised by women and had warped mentalities. So I finally had to date outside my race. When I moved to Miami, I accepted my status and dated men on my level.

Interviewer - What do you mean by warped mentalities?

Serena : Well, where do I begin? Many of them were raised predominantly by women and had this feminine/bisexual complex. Where they wanted to be treated like a female sometimes. For example, I would have the money & they would have the sex. I would teach them things. You know, all the things a woman likes a man to do, I would end up doing for them. Then if we would get into an argument, there would be a role reversal. All of a sudden, they would be the man wanting the respect of a king in his castle. Black men over the years have become less and less of value to black women both rich and poor. I predict in 10 years they will be obsolete. Now they serve little to no function and what little they can do, they don't want to do.

Interviewer - Why 10 years?

Serena : That's when going to a fertility clinic to get impregnated by a sperm donor will become as common and accessible as the flu shot. Women who want sex will do it with whoever they want ( girl, guy, rich, poor, white, black) and go to the bank (the sperm bank) when they are ready to have children. Even those who waited (like Oprah) will have fertilized eggs placed in Vitro. That's the day the secret organization of women is waiting for. The day when men are 100% dis-empowered.

Interviewer - Are you apart of that organization?

Serena : No. They're a mostly white group. Plus that day for black men is practically here already. Black women are already raising 75% of the black population without a man. When fertility clinics become more affordable. Black women will be standing in line. It will be just like plastic surgery. Everyone laughed at Michael Jackson but its becoming so popular now, that even poor blacks are getting work done...mostly breast reductions and liposuction.

Interviewer - So do you want men to be dis-empowered?

Serena : Heck, no! That's why I am with a white man now. I want a man to be a man and I am not going to settle for less just to stay within racial boundaries. A Black man in my position wouldn't do it so why should I. Don't get me wrong, I love black men. My father is black, I have dated black men all my life, and if I have a male child he will be part black. But my husband and I will raise him together so hopefully he will be a worthy choice for a worthy black female. Not the only choice, or "there's nothing better out there so I'll settle for this" choice. When you are successful you want the best. The best food, clothes, places to live etc. I want the best man also.

Interviewer - And you think the best man is a non-black man?

Serena : I think if there's a better choice for me, God would have shown me. I am in the public so I get to meet lots of people from all over the world athletes, celebs etc.I am wealthy so I am invited and have traveled to the most prestigious events all over the world. Out of all those people, places and events....I had to choose the right man for me. Like it or not with very few exceptions) a white man is the only real choice for a successful black female.

Early in December 2004, the specious interview quoted above came to be flung from inbox to inbox. In it, tennis sensation Serena Williams slams African-American men ("Like a poor homeless dog"), predicting they will be obsolete in ten years once artificial insemination has become "as common and accessible as the flu shot," identifies Oprah Winfrey as unmarried and childless because she "silently protests being stuck with such poor choices," and tips us all to a "secret organization of women" ("mostly white") that is waiting for "[T]he day when men are 100% dis-empowered."

Before anyone lets the tennis star's purported comments get them too riled, it needs to be pointed out that this blood-boiler of an interview is a fake. At this time it is not known who penned it or why, but the exchange is fiction.

In a press release issued by her publicist, Raymone K. Bain, of Davis, Bain and Associates, Inc., the interview is labeled "an absolute hoax." Says Ms. Bain: "Serena Williams has not conducted and would not, under under any circumstance, conduct such an interview. We are making every attempt to find the source of this hoax."

The 24-time tennis champion herself is quoted:
Words cannot express how upset I am to find out that someone has deliberately attempted to ruin my reputation and image.

I would never, ever, under any circumstance, be so disrespectful. Whoever decided to write this garbage does not know Serena Williams. It is not my thinking nor my being. I want to find out who is behind this, and have them prosecuted within the fullest extend of the law. I am hoping that there will be more policing over the Internet, in order to find out immediately the origin of this kind of treachery. No one deserves to be humiliated and defamed this way.

Those who were somewhat tempted to believe even a few of the enraging comments supposedly made by the 23-year-old tennis player should have noted the lack of checkable datapoints in the original "interview" — the person conducting the exchange was identified only as "Interviewer" and the publication that supposedly carried the piece was not named. Either of these two datapoints being unverifiable should have given pause; that both were missing should have sounded the alarm bells.

On 7 December 2004, nationally syndicated radio host Russ Parr passed along to his web site visitors the Serena Williams "interview." (We're told he also read the piece on air and later in the show had Ms. Williams' publicist on to refute it, but we can't confirm that as we weren't tuned in.) The next day he added to the previous offering by posting the statement from Serena Williams' publicist.

As for who Serena Williams might or might not be dating, she's been keeping company with film director Brett Ratner. In November 2004, he said of the pairing, "I'm the last guy she'd thought she'd end up with. I'm a short, pudgy Jewish guy — not her type."

60 Days Until Tennessee Exposes The Urban Myth In Gainesville!!
 
#39
#39
We'll have to make some kinda bet beltway...i cant wait, my only problem is i dont have tix (noooooooooooooooooooo, lol) hopefully i can pull a couple strings or find some on ebay and ill get in the swamp.
 
#42
#42
Originally posted by GatorVille@Jul 16, 2005 10:22 PM
Im not putting words in anyones mouth.  I think we should have confidence in a coach that hasnt lost a game in 2 years and won the fiesta bowl last year.  I am confident in a team that lost 5 games each of the past 3 seasons.  All of those teams were pourly coached, that will changed.  All of those teams were very tallented but young, that has changed.  UF was very good before SOS.  I dont know why everyone thinks that we sucked.  We were a solid team, and I believe we won some rundown poll that claimed us NTL champs.  It was a very minor poll however, IIRC.  So please, look at things from outside your orange and white glasses- UF will be good.  Noone here can deny were very tallented, and we return almost  everyone.  UT MIGHT win, but UF MIGHT aswell, it seems to me that all of you are marking UF down as a W, and im simply telling you were no pushover.
[snapback]114999[/snapback]​


Maybe we need a Volungator board where there are no arch rivals and everyone lives peacefully among each other and all games end in a tie. I always liked the "Highlander" where the moto was, "There can be only one."
 
#43
#43
Claim: Sucking on a penny or a breath mint will help someone who has been drinking defeat a breathalyzer test.

[Collected on the Internet, 1994]

A distant friend relayed this one. He was drunk and a cop pulled him over. He said the first thing he did was stuff a handful of pennies in his mouth and then spit them out as the officer approached the car. He said a short time later he was given a breathalizer test and because of the copper alloy residue (or whatever) the breathalizer tester went bonkers and they couldn't get an accurate evaluation and was off the hook.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Collected on the Internet, 2001]
Here's something I heard a little over a year ago supposedly from a friend of a friend. At the time my friend told me that he heard that several states were trying to outlaw Icebreakers gum because it would disguise alcoholic content in breathalyzer tests and the readings would come out negative. As far as I know, Icebreakers is still being sold and I have yet to hear about a real lawsuit or a law being made to stop it.

Origins: Everyone is in favor of keeping drunk drivers off the road, but no one ever wants to think of himself as falling into that category. For this reason, we adore the notion of little easy-to-do tricks that will keep us, the occasional overindulgers, from being rounded up and tossed into the hoosegow as if we were actual miscreants who make our roads dangerous. It's not for those lawless killers who routinely get totaled then slip behind the wheel of a car, you understand. It's for us, the ordinary folk who get pulled over that one time we had a drink on our way home.

All imaginary halos and denials aside, none of these tricks work. Pennies held in the mouth no more fool the breathalyzer than would hopping on one foot while reciting the Lord's Prayer. There's nothing magical about the presumed copper content of a one-cent piece that negates the test. (From 1982 on, the U.S. one-cent coin has been made of 97.5% zinc with a copper coating.) Likewise, although mints and various other breath treatments are at least somewhat effective on masking the odor of alcohol on the tippler's breath, they do nothing to affect the presence of demon rum in that person's system. In other words, even if the smell is not detectable, the alcohol itself is.

A breathalyzer measures the chemical reaction between the amount of alcohol expelled on the breath and the contents of a vial in a breathalyzer machine. It's important that the test be delayed for 20 minutes after the person being examined has had a drink else "mouth alcohol" may interfere with the results. (Traces of booze generally remain in the mouth for 10 to 15 minutes after a drink is taken. The 20 minute deprivation period allows for this to dissipate.)

Additionally, many police officers assert breathalyzer results can be compromised by the subject's burping while being tested (which they believe would increase the presence of mouth alcohol). That belief is more lore than science: According to a 1992 study performed at the Laboratory of Hygiene at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, belching had no effect on breathalyzer results. In one study subjects belched and blew into the instrument 15 minutes after taking a drink of alcohol; the reading was recorded then compared to another reading taken one minute later. There was no difference. Even when people would bring up a belch of gas directly into the instrument, there was no effect.

Folks have done many strange things over the years in an effort to beat the machine. In a case heard in an Alberta courtroom in March 1985, 28-year-old Dave Zurfluh who was stopped on suspicion of driving while under the influence ate his undershorts in the belief they would soak up the excess alcohol in his system. According to Constable Bill Robinson, the arresting officer, he heard "some ripping and tearing" from the back of the cruiser. "I looked in the back and he was tearing pieces of the crotch of his underwear out and stuffing them in his mouth," Robinson testified.

We've no idea if the eating of the shorts was what got him off, but Dave Zurfluh was acquitted of all charges because he'd blown .08 on the breathalyzer, the legal limit.

In March 2005 a 59-year-old accused drunk driver in Ontario tried to foil a police breathalyser by stuffing his mouth full of feces. He had been taken to the police station for testing, where he grabbed a handful of his own waste "and placed it in his mouth, attempting to trick the breathalyser machine," said Sgt. James Buchanan of the South Simcoe Police. It didn't work. The machine registered two readings of intoxication from samples the suspect provided. Both were more than twice the legal limit.

As for the "penny" canard, that too has been tried in real life. In August 2000, one East Hampton man pulled over for drunk driving was discovered to be sucking on a penny when approached for a breathalyzer sample. His speech was slurred, he couldn't stand up straight, and he failed all the standard sobriety tests, yet still he had faith in the "penny under the tongue" trick to save the day.

The notion that "smell of booze equals booze itself" fuels the erroneous belief that breath improvers are effective counters to the breathalyzer test. Possibly in an attempt to cash in on this confusion, in 1997 a British company began marking "Breathalyzer Blitz," mints advertised for their ability to rid breath of alcohol odors. The spokespeople for Blitz Design Corp. were always upfront in their denials that their mints would negate breathalyzer test results, but the name of the confection itself might well have misled many into believing these particular candies would have that effect.

Also, those whose tipple of choice was Zima (a sweet colorless beverage especially favored by the younger set) were often under the mistaken impression that the booze in that particular concoction was not detectable via breathalyzer examination. Because Zima leaves little smell on the breath, its devotees concluded the alcohol contained in the beverage itself would prove similarly hard to pin down. They were wrong, of course, because Zima contained about the same amount of alcohol as ordinary beer and the breathalyzer would always pick up on that. Yet this tidbit of lore proved surprisingly hardy and was often swapped among teens as a "Did you know?" revelation.


59 Days Unitl The Vols Crush The Urban Myth!
 
#44
#44
I can't believe no one shares my confidence in predicting that TN will blowout FLA by two TD's and Leak will not finish the game. Urb and the Gators have to be the most hyped team in NCAA history. 6 wins will be stretching it for the IMPERSONURBANGATOR!


I BELIEVE!


Nice urban myths by the way BeltwayVol
 
#45
#45
If you want to try your own mythical tricks on the breathalyzer, there's a club on Duval Street in Key West that has one near the front door. I think it's Durty Harry's?
 
#46
#46
Claim: The brassiere was invented by Otto Titzling.

Status: False.

Origins: The realm of popular wisdom is replete with well-traveled factoids that found their way into our culture via a deliberate hoax or playful leg-pull. Such is the case with the notion that the brassiere was invented by the so appropriately named Otto Titzling.

According to an inventive history of the undergarment that is now widely believed, Titzling came to invent the item while living in a New York boardinghouse in 1912. One of his neighbors was a buxom opera singer named Swanhilda Olafson, and the structural engineering problems she presented inspired Titzling to create a contraption to uphold this lady's ample bosom. In the early 1930s, a French fellow named Phillip de Brassiere began producing a similar undergarment. Titzling sued, but Brassiere won in court, and that is why today we call a lady's frontal uplifter a brassiere instead of a titzling.

It's a great story, but there's no truth to it. The madness began with a 1971 book by Wallace Reyburn titled Bust-Up: The Uplifting Tale of Otto Titzling and the Development of the Bra. Like his 1972 send-up, The Inferior Sex: A Treatise on the Inferiority of Women, Bust-Up was a work of satire. (Reyburn wasn't always a jokester, however. Although his biography of Thomas Crapper has often been dismissed as a hoax, Flushed with Pride: The Story of Thomas Crapper was actually on the up-and-up, if somewhat inaccurate.)

The brassiere has been around in one form or another at least since Greek women wore a chest binding called a mastodeton or apodesmos while exercising. When to date the invention of the modern brassiere to presents a bit of a problem -- it depends on how one defines the contraption.

Metallic constructions that looked like bras and did serve to hold matters rigidly in place were around as early as 1859, as a patent granted to Henry S. Lesher of Brooklyn, NY, shows. However, to think of this monstrosity as a garment would be to equate medieval armor with a leisure suit.

Closer to the concept was Clara P. Clark's 1874 "improved corset," a fabric construction that bore a resemblance to today's long-line bra. The fundamental element of her design was the pattern for a fabric breast pocket system held up by shoulder straps that crisscrossed the back.

Olivia P. Flynt's 1876 "bust supporter" could possibly be pointed to as the original brassiere provided one accepts shoulder straps that look more like the shoulder yokes of an ordinary blouse. Flynt designed a fabric garment that fit around the upper half of the torso, holding each breast in a fabric pocket supported by shoulder straps. Though the illustration used to support her patent application showed an unadorned garment, written notes accompanying the sketch indicated that the straps could both be made thinner and adorned with lace. She also provided for a double-walled version which permitted the insertion of additional padding to enhance an underdeveloped lady's charms.

Charles Moorehouse came up with an inflatable breast enlarging garment in 1885. It featured air-filled rubber cups that held each breast, and the strapping design is not so far removed from today's undergarments to render his creation unrecognizeable as a proto-bra.

Most experts, however, point to 19th-century French feminist Herminie Cadolle as the true inventor of the brassiere and the date of the invention as 1889.

Upon moving to Argentina in the mid-1800's, Cadolle opened a shop selling fancy French underwear. The enterprise flourished, turning Cadolle into a globetrotting businesswoman. Her active lifestyle and busy schedule soon convinced her there just had to be a better foundation garment for women like her than the then-universal and very uncomfortable corset.

In 1889 she moved back to Paris, there to set up her main shop. She soon after began work on the task of engineering a better undergarment. The top half of her 1889 two-part invention was "designed to sustain the bosom and supported by the shoulders." (The bottom half was a corset that covered only the waist and rear.) Cadolle named this two-piecer le bien-être (the wellbeing).

By 1905, the two-piecer had become two separate pieces, with the top half coming to be called a soutin-gorge (throat support).

How and when the modern bra gained the name we now know it by remains unclear. "Brassiere" is an ambiguous word to attempt to trace because it was around a long time before anyone thought to use it as the name for a woman's breast-holding undergarment. It had been employed since 17th century by the French, originally meaning a soldier's arm guard or shield. Eventually, it came to mean any kind of upper-body harnass with arm straps. By the beginning of the 20th century, "brassiere" had come to be synonymous with "bodice." By the 1920s, it had come to identify cupped breast support garments, which is where the word remains today.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the word means "a woman's undergarment worn to support the breasts."

Who connected that word with that meaning, however, is unknown and possibly unknowable. Some say an American named Charles de Bevoise christened it thus in 1902. Others assert that the word turned up in an 1890 issue of Vogue magazine, and others dispute them, saying it didn't appear there until 1907.

58 Days Until Tennessee Exposes The Urban Myth
 
#47
#47
Originally posted by VolFantotheBone@Jul 20, 2005 6:38 PM
I BELIEVE!
Nice urban myths by the way BeltwayVol
[snapback]116324[/snapback]​



You also believe rick clausen is better then chris leak so your credibility is kind of shattered right now.




BTW, where are you getting all of these things beltway :laugh1:
 
#49
#49
You also believe rick clausen is better then chris leak so your credibility is kind of shattered right now.


as compared to, say....

UF was very good before SOS.


Nice try, really.... <_<

Since the Bamma thing is winding down I need a new signature. But what too.... hummmm
 
#50
#50
Jeeze you guys... Saying Florida was that good before Spurrier is a big stretch, and saying Rick Clausen is better than Chris Leak is equally as big of a stretch. Alright?
 

VN Store



Back
Top