US may have killed Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani

Three steps ahead? Is that what you call threatening to bomb disproportionately and to also attack cultural sites? Because to me, that appeared to be the rhetoric of an impulsive and emotionally unstable person.
Thank goodness it was one of the rare times Trump allowed his advisers to talk him off the ledge.
 
I am waiting on Bowl brother to tell me what this video means before I respond
Thanks for the shout out. Were you paying attention earlier today when Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) condemned Trump's national security officials for delivering "the worst military briefing" he had ever seen, even claiming that one official had warned during the "lame" and "insane" meeting that Congress shouldn't even debate whether additional military action against Iran would be appropriate?

I guess this means that you have to attack Sen. Mike Lee for being a "Never Trumper". Right?
 


In other words Pelosi is fuming because the dims didn't have an answer; and worse, they didn't even get fodder to use in the promised attack on the War Powers Act. She's watching it all slip away, and her Trump impeachment is slipping into obscurity. That's gotta sting. That impeachment thing is beginning to look a lot like when Hiliary decided to try out the "deplorable" line.
 
Thank goodness it was one of the rare times Trump allowed his advisers to talk him off the ledge.

Wait. I thought the party line earlier was that there were no advisers - just a long list of vacancies because Trump fired them, the FBI indicted them, or they decided they hate Trump's guts.
 
Three steps ahead? Is that what you call threatening to bomb disproportionately and to also attack cultural sites? Because to me, that appeared to be the rhetoric of an impulsive and emotionally unstable person.

That was threatening something that the Iranians may care about.... you have to make them believe that you are capable of anything.... he proved not to be impulsive, emotional, or unstable when he showed restraint last night.
 
Three steps ahead? Is that what you call threatening to bomb disproportionately and to also attack cultural sites? Because to me, that appeared to be the rhetoric of an impulsive and emotionally unstable person.

No he didn’t!!!! The cultural sites????
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Thanks for the shout out. Were you paying attention earlier today when Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) condemned Trump's national security officials for delivering "the worst military briefing" he had ever seen, even claiming that one official had warned during the "lame" and "insane" meeting that Congress shouldn't even debate whether additional military action against Iran would be appropriate?

I guess this means that you have to attack Sen. Mike Lee for being a "Never Trumper". Right?

Thanks for now supporting Senator Lee. But because 2 people didn't like what they heard and all other Republicans did seems pretty open and shut to me that this is a non issue. Unlike the Democrats Republicans are allowed to disagree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Wait. I thought the party line earlier was that there were no advisers - just a long list of vacancies because Trump fired them, the FBI indicted them, or they decided they hate Trump's guts.
Of course Trump deserves zero credit for how a war has been averted (averted at least for now).
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
That was threatening something that the Iranians may care about.... you have to make them believe that you are capable of anything.... he proved not to be impulsive, emotional, or unstable when he showed restraint last night.

But in B squared's mind the fact he threatened that trumps what good actions were. And I get it after years of appeasement it's no wonder cases of PTSD skyrocketed to never before seen levels in the past 24 hours. The president may have secured his 3rd term with his speech today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Thanks for the shout out. Were you paying attention earlier today when Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) condemned Trump's national security officials for delivering "the worst military briefing" he had ever seen, even claiming that one official had warned during the "lame" and "insane" meeting that Congress shouldn't even debate whether additional military action against Iran would be appropriate?

I guess this means that you have to attack Sen. Mike Lee for being a "Never Trumper". Right?

It is funny how Dems are now all about Mike Lee.
 
Thanks for now supporting Senator Lee. But because 2 people didn't like what they heard and all other Republicans did seems pretty open and shut to me that this is a non issue. Unlike the Democrats Republicans are allowed to disagree.
Does this mean that Trump won't be attacking Sen. Mike Lee on Twitter tomorrow? I bet he does.
 

VN Store



Back
Top