US may have killed Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani

The tweeter could have allowed the video to play out further and the speaker to explain the comment. Not that it would have helped. Anyone wanting permission to hate others more has all they need right there to go from.

All hail the sound byte, most holy of weapons of the masses.
The rest of the comment doesn't make it any better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Has all the hallmarks of one of grandpa's fishing stories. Somehow the bluegill caught in a pond morphs into a mako shark caught in the open sea.

 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
LOL, do you even know what my political ideology is? I think we agree but your still taking issue with me somehow.

I took issue with the implication that George 1 or 2 ever did anything that contributed to the current political riff between the parties. Those 2 regardless of what you thought of them were about as civil and you get. I remember the debate between W and Algore where he made Gore look like a lunatic with all his fake outrage. If that was not your take accept my apology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Grasping at straws straws is when libs attempt to feel remorse for a dead terrorist.

Unless I missed something earlier in the conversation, the poster in question was simply pointing out documented pattern of behavior. I didn't see any subtext or inference that suggested "remorse".
 
Unless I missed something earlier in the conversation, the poster in question was simply pointing out documented pattern of behavior. I didn't see any subtext or inference that suggested "remorse".

If that's the case why would someone mention anything about Embassy or embassies? Most on this side of the political aisle can decipher what was implied. But you guys go ahead and keep defending this nonsense. And the dead terrorist will go on being dead. Not passing go nor collecting 72 virgins. Trump 2 high level terrorist 0. That is like an insurmountable 2 nothing lead in soccer.
 
If that's the case why would someone mention anything about Embassy or embassies? Most on this side of the political aisle can decipher what was implied. But you guys go ahead and keep defending this nonsense. And the dead terrorist will go on being dead. Not passing go nor collecting 72 virgins. Trump 2 high level terrorist 0. That is like an insurmountable 2 nothing lead in soccer.

Sigh.

"You guys."

I don't give two shirts about either side's score. I'm just having fun calling out bad data, bad logic, and watching adults hiding behind monitors and phone screens divide up a playground into pointless territories then fight over them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
Cheezits forking rice... Birth sides and their cheap little absolutist litmus tests. They get old after a while.
 
Sigh.

"You guys."

I don't give two shirts about either side's score. I'm just having fun calling out bad data, bad logic, and watching adults hiding behind monitors and phone screens divide up a playground into pointless territories then fight over them.
Apparently you've ventured into Redhat territory. I think the passphrase is "which hunt hoax". You say that and I they'll let you be on your way.
 
Apparently you've ventured into Redhat territory. I think the passphrase is "which hunt hoax". You say that and I they'll let you be on your way.

And if you get stuck in too far leftville , the new password is “ imminent threat “ whispered quietly .
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I took issue with the implication that George 1 or 2 ever did anything that contributed to the current political riff between the parties. Those 2 regardless of what you thought of them were about as civil and you get. I remember the debate between W and Algore where he made Gore look like a lunatic with all his fake outrage. If that was not your take accept my apology.
There was a misunderstanding. I was pointing out that discourse during the time of those presidents and all the others listed got worse and worse. Perhaps I did not explain well enough. No worries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40 and AM64
I'm sorry that happened but you need to take personal responsibility in you decisions to get a loan for a house and investing in upgrades. because you didn't qualify for some socialized safety net, that you have been vocal against all forms of, In no way should you blame Obama.
Obama changed the leading practice, it was one payment. My responsibility was met for 14 years and we paid cash for the garage, new fencing, the shed, new roof and my SUV. The hospital finally admitted responsibility and settled 6 years later. I fail to see where i wasn't taking responsibility but instead offer that my contact was changed without my input by Chase due to new regulations, the responsibility lies elsewhere. I would have never applied for assistance. The banks previous practice changed and they required it.
How many times have you heard me speak of this?
 
Obama changed the leading practice, it was one payment. My responsibility was met for 14 years and we paid cash for the garage, new fencing, the shed, new roof and my SUV. The hospital finally admitted responsibility and settled 6 years later. I fail to see where i wasn't taking responsibility but instead offer that my contact was changed without my input by Chase due to new regulations, the responsibility lies elsewhere. I would have never applied for assistance. The banks previous practice changed and they required it.
How many times have you heard me speak of this?

What amazes me ... and maybe one of the legal beagles here can explain it ... is that financial institutions constantly and unilaterally change contracts by simply sending out a statement that we are doing this ... I always thought that the purpose of a contract was to put in terms the obligations of each side - not a piece of paper giving one side the address they need to tell the other side what the new deal is.
 

VN Store



Back
Top