NurseGoodVol
Middle…ish
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- Messages
- 14,405
- Likes
- 25,447
Yes. Beyond one tweet that kinda sorta supported the 1/6 action, but to any objective person not at all. What link is there to Trump directing it?
If it's just a populist uprising (assuming you believe it was a hostile attempt to take over) there is no link to Trump or it being a coup.
No action was taken that stopped the transition, Biden is our president. Many of congress werent even there for this vote, ala AOC. The incredibly angry violent MAGa mob apparently forgot their guns, and most of the deaths arent directly linked to them, and NO politician was even harmed.
No other government entities were bothered. No other centers of power were bothered, and so far the only follow up action has been the complete nonactions back in early March. No foreign backing, not even puppet master Putin little green men showed up.
To call this a coup is laughable when you look at any of the details.
Violent protest, sure. Illegal, maybe? Coup, laughably not. There was no way the actions that actually happened that day actually provided a viable threat to our system of government.
?? This seems like a pretty fundamental issue in a conversation about whether or not people were trying to overthrow the government.The question was about your comment that the manner of succession set forth in the constitution (states choose electors, electors choose president) is just “policy.”
Are you really saying that the method of executive succession (I.e state choose via electors or the Vice President chooses unilaterally) is a matter of policy?
And by “policy” I mean that it is subject to change based on the preferences of factions or parties within the government.
Tax rates are policy.
Whether or not to implement federal reform of municipal police departments is policy.
Do you really think republic vs. autocracy is policy?
Nascar recently made Kyle Busch attend sensitivity training when using that word in an interview. He was referring to another driver he was upset with at the time.I think I know what you mean.
Have you been paying attention to Kazakhstan recently? How about Ukraine in 2014? How do they compare to January 6th?Republicans push bogus Jan. 6 claim because their voters believe it
Only 4% believed it was an attempted coup by the former president, which it obviously was. Actual insanity.
The delusions keep on coming. Anyone here been added to the no-fly list yet?
Don't be Rupert Murdoch's bitch... turn off Fox News and talk radio and come join reality.
?? This seems like a pretty fundamental issue in a conversation about whether or not people were trying to overthrow the government.
I think I’ve said 5 times now that I’ve already answered these arguments that the coup was poorly planned/executed, that the participants were delusional, and/or that it had no realistic hope of success. They do not make it something other than a coup. The participants intent, constitutionality, and whether their actions were in furtherance of that intent are what matter when deciding what to call it.
There’s a slightly more detailed post that probably covers everything you said, earlier in the thread. Happy to build on or defend it. No need to repeat it for the third rerun of the same bad argument.
As far as Trump “directing” it, I don’t think he did. I don’t think that’s necessary to the common use of the word coup as it’s been used here for the past 3 years. A coup is a sudden, illegal/unconstitutional effort to overthrow the government, usually by force although one could argue that’s not always been necessary. That is exactly what they were trying to do, even if it was a poor effort.
You can call it what you want. Defending, normalizing, and making excuses for this dipshittery seems like a surefire way to put the crazies on the right back at the margins of government, where they belong. As for me, I’m happy to keep calling it a coup for reasons I’ve explained earlier in this thread.
That's pretty much what it boils down to. They were upset that Republicans were using the same tactic they used just 4 years previously.Do you hold those on the left in congress who did not want to certify the Trump election in 2016 to this same standard? Or do you defend, normalize, and make excuses for this dipshittery