USAID may be the biggest scandal in American History.

head under a rock? maybe you need to get out from under it and objectively look at what Trump is doing.


I hope he is somehow successful in that but it is unlikely. But Mr Hohman solves the problem in the event he isn't. Keep those families together so AOC doesn't cry.
 
it may be the fastest way, but that doesn't make it the best way.

It would be quicker if I used a bazooka to blow up any door in my way. doesn't mean I should do it.
We are talking about the Swamp of DC. A bazooka has been needed for decades.

Go DOGE
 
I believe this is true. But I don't trust our government. I believe the good they do is the cover for the larger bad they do around the world...... And have for years. It's time the government is held accountable to the people..... Not acting in spite of.

And if Trump is wrong and this isn't happening great .....I hope he looks like a fool. If he's right..... Then we've lost nothing and are gaining a true, representative and accountable government.
1738725197280.png
 
Must have missed that one..... Spill the deets!

If history has taught us anything, it's that we should totally insert ourselves in between the Palestinians and Israeli's. We should also occupy their lands with our troops - that never blows up in our faces.
 
I figured Trump would be an ask for forgiveness type rather than ask for permission. He could have just started deporting, and let it be challenged.

IMO I don't see it any different than locking up the, US citizen, parents of a kid. you carry out the job regardless. Give the parents a choice on what happens to their kid: Child leaves with them, and can legally enter at 18. Child stays with, legal, family or guardians. Child goes into child custody.
Both with the same outcome of forcing judicial review.

I do. Both would be declared 'attacking rights' by some. This way doesn't bother separating a child or deporting anyone; again, I think this was the perfect way to initiate review given the two choices.
 
Last edited:
Not me.

In the press conference he said this would only be after the Palestinians would be relocated. Will be interesting for sure.

It was hard to pinpoint the most absurd thing he said in that conference. Each sentence was slightly more wild than the last.

Bro wants his legacy to be to bring peace in the middle east. I wish him luck, this almost never works. I for one am looking forward to more long term American nation re-building of a terrorist sympathizing people through occupation.
 
It was hard to pinpoint the most absurd thing he said in that conference. Each sentence was slightly more wild than the last.

Bro wants his legacy to be to bring peace in the middle east. I wish him luck, this almost never works. I for one am looking forward to more long term American nation re-building of a terrorist sympathizing people through occupation.

That is what has been going on the last few decades. Matter of fact, Hillary was funding and supporting all but one group in Syria... meaning groups Americans were fighting were getting U.S. funding. You didn't seem to mind.

Keep raging for the machine, its funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol

If history has taught us anything, it's that we should totally insert ourselves in between the Palestinians and Israeli's. We should also occupy their lands with our troops - that never blows up in our faces.
Just woke up and saw that this morning. And those were my exact thoughts. Then I thought about your response yesterday. This is incredibly risky, I think it's a horrible idea. This is extremely high risk/high reward but the variables are wild and I don't see how American blood goes not end up spilled over this.
 
If it was intended as you say, why would it say 'including formerly enslaved people' rather than just say it applies to just formerly enslaved people?
Like I said...in context. In the context of the time it was written, it was to bring all people in america together with rights and freedoms. And to give citizenship to descendents of peoples here against their will. Even in the context of it's purpose, the 14th at that time did not grant unilateral citizenship to everybody and their dog and goat. It did not say, OK you come to our country illegally and pump out a baby and get free birthrights and all kinds of stuff in your goody bags. With any level of reading comprehension, the 14th is not for illegal immigration abuse.
 
Just woke up and saw that this morning. And those were my exact thoughts. Then I thought about your response yesterday. This is incredibly risky, I think it's a horrible idea. This is extremely high risk/high reward but the variables are wild and I don't see how American blood goes not end up spilled over this.

There is no reward if we did this.
 

VN Store



Back
Top