I really like our LB vs your OL match-up with 5 new starters coming in all at once.
I really really like your QB vs the air match up. I think whoever starts, they'll be among the bottom half of QBs we play all season. It's nothing personal against tennessee as a program, I just think your quarterbacks have played absolutely horrendously and I dont see why it would change game one.
Another variable in our favor is that it is the first game. if there is a time to get a crop of talented recruits, it would be the first game. doesn't mean they'll be bad, but it favors us more than it would later on.
having a 4 year starting QB is a positive variable too, even though he is coming back from an injury a year ago.
Your perception of QB talent is versus our schedule. See everything I posted above in regards to drawing conclusions based on dissimilar opponents. And, see also the delta in talent by position group that I offered. It is very difficult to look good with either a 4th string QB versus SEC caliber defenses, or with a starting QB and young receivers versus SEC caliber defenses (Oregon's D wasn't half bad either).
So you like your LB vs. our O- Line? Do you foresee many sacks and run stuffing opportunities? See the conversation and proof of not only how talent matters substantially but also about how experience isn't nearly as important as most believe. Given that our O - Line is young, I can see how that might seem to side with you. I'm just not sure years of data to the contrary agrees.
I look forward to a good game and hope that your men show up like you believe. We need to be tested before we get into the meat of the schedule. You guys look less daunting than anyone else on our schedule besides UT -C from a talent perspective.
I'm not predicting a blow out. Honestly I don't care if the win is by 1 or 100. I think your "favorable" factors will influence the score differential to some degree just not the outcome which is heavily in UTs favor.