You brought up the Vandy comparison. And when someone noted that Butch didn't have much time in that first year, who said he had the same amount of time as other first year coaches, which seems irrelevant to me unless you are comparing him to other first-year coaches.
Again, you are the one who brought up the Vandy comparison. You're comparing a team at their historical peak who had a solid coach in his third year, with a guy trying to clean up Dooley's mess (who seemed to stop recruiting mid-year) in a mere two months. I don't see how that's a fair comparison. Do you?
Yes. We're seriously debating this? Yes, I think it is fair to expect the coach at UT to outrecruit the coach at Vanderbilt, no matter what year they're in. Have you seen their facilities? Their stadium? Any idea of what kind of budget they are working with?
Are you really telling me that you believe that a first year coach at UT shouldn't be expected to outrecruit anyone other than other first year coaches? Or that they shouldn't be expected to outrecruit a Vanderbilt coach in their third year?
His final recruiting rank doesn't mean he didn't do a good job from day one, if he took a 50th rated class (just throwing out a number) and made it a top 20 class.
I guess I'm trying to understand your point: It's Butch's fault Vandy had a better class? I'm not sure you noticed, but Vandy has been a better program under Franklin than Tennessee was under Dooley.
We both know that, regardless of the class ranking when he took over, that class was going to rise in rankings by the end, regardless of who the coach was. Even Dooley (the worst coach in UT history) would have improved the class ranking by signing day. Look at how much other SEC programs rose in the rankings in the last two months. Look at how quickly they are rising now.
And where was it a top 20 class? The highest I saw anyone rank it was 21 (on rivals. it was 29th on espn).