Vaccine or not?

[NorthDallas40]

You also assume the SCOTUS will even hear the case...

I believe they will wind up ruling on all three mandates currently in various phases in the courts.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Off to the Supreme Court we go! It was headed there anyway so let’s get this party started.

If they allow it, it will be the biggest government overreach in history.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

What does politics have to do with me getting or not getting the jab ? Only an idiot would allow politicians and media whores to make that decision for you .

Isn't it interesting that all the hard core vaxxers bring politics into it? My political leanings have zero to do with it.

 

[NorthDallas40]

If they allow it, it will be the biggest government overreach in history.

It would be counter to every ruling on the books which all currently vest the authority with such issues as enforcement of vaccine mandates and public health issues with the states.

 

[C-south]

You antivaxers were right, vaccines don’t work…
View attachment 421631
Seriously, how do you look at these numbers and go "I'll take my chances"

Because these numbers are based on less than 1% of those that contract covid.

 

[C-south]

If they allow it, it will be the biggest government overreach in history.

It seems to be working so well in the professional sports ranks.

 

[ButchPlz]

Because these numbers are based on less than 1% of those that contract covid.

224 people at 22 hospitals across a massive portion of population.

You just know that's all statistically significant and should change our minds.

EDIT: also, 1) I don't believe them, and 2) what's their definition of "vaccinated", because nobody can even agree on that.

 

[clarksvol00]

No one called you a name...just said your single minded in your obession...

Go read your post again with "your sand singled kinded little head." You talk about obsession, but you don't address the premise of my original comment. All you care about is what you think I think about Trump. You're exactly the kind of "muh... TDS" person I was talking about last week.

 

[ButchPlz]

Go read your post again with your sand singled kinded little head. You talk about obsession, but you don't address the premise of my original comment. All you care about is what you think I think about Trump. You're exactly the kind of "muh... TDS" person I was talking about last week.

I had a stroke trying to decipher this drivel. Reading this is more dangerous than COVID.

 

[clarksvol00]

I had a stroke trying to decipher this drivel. Reading this is more dangerous than COVID.

Love ya, neighbor!

 

[ButchPlz]

Love ya, neighbor!

Ok?

 

[clarksvol00]

Ok?

By the way the indecipherable part of my post was a direct quote of @whodeycin85 .

 

[ButchPlz]

By the why the indecipherable part of my post was a direct quote of @whodeycin85 .

 

[clarksvol00]

Thanks.

Edit: my rule is I only calling our spelling/grammar when somebody is making fun of somebody else's intellect, so I deserve what I get on this one.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Thanks.

Edit: my rule is I only calling our spelling/grammar when somebody is making fun of somebody else's intellect, so I deserve what I get on this one.

Damn… the last two or three days with you.

 

[VolinWayne]

Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
Rapid Response:Open letter from The BMJ to Mark Zuckerberg

Dear Mark Zuckerberg,

We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.


Open letter from The BMJ to Mark Zuckerberg

For those who don't know, The BMJ is a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal, published by the trade union the British Medical Association (BMA). The BMJ has editorial freedom from the BMA. It is one of the world's oldest general medical journals. Originally called the British Medical Journal, the title was officially shortened to BMJ in 1988, and then changed to The BMJ in 2014. The journal is published by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, a subsidiary of the British Medical Association (BMA). The editor-in-chief of The BMJ is Fiona Godlee, who was appointed in February 2005.

 

[whodeycin85]

Go read your post again with "your sand singled kinded little head." You talk about obsession, but you don't address the premise of my original comment. All you care about is what you think I think about Trump. You're exactly the kind of "muh... TDS" person I was talking about last week.

Single minded little head is name calling??? Sensitive much....keep on trucking my good man...im sure it'll make you feel better......and yes there was mispelling..my bad..

 

[Septic]

OF course the correct word you are looking for is 'coercion'.

tomato, tomato.

Choose wisely.

 

[AshG]

Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
Rapid Response:Open letter from The BMJ to Mark Zuckerberg

Dear Mark Zuckerberg,

We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.


Open letter from The BMJ to Mark Zuckerberg

For those who don't know, The BMJ is a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal, published by the trade union the British Medical Association (BMA). The BMJ has editorial freedom from the BMA. It is one of the world's oldest general medical journals. Originally called the British Medical Journal, the title was officially shortened to BMJ in 1988, and then changed to The BMJ in 2014. The journal is published by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, a subsidiary of the British Medical Association (BMA). The editor-in-chief of The BMJ is Fiona Godlee, who was appointed in February 2005.

Zuckerberg couldn't find his ass with both hands, a map, and an assistant helping out. He's turned Facebook into an absolute dumpster fire.

 

[Septic]

Hows it different....didnt he offer employment/advancement for sex??
Wanna work/advance, get the jab..

If you support biz forcing the vax, then your ok Weinsteins biz practices..

See this is the problem with you guys, you don't even understand the argument that' being had. You keep shoehorning the word "force" into the conversation, literally no one is "forcing" anyone to get vaccinated.

If you don't want the vaccination, great - seek employment elsewhere. It's simply a condition of employment that isn't owed to anyone.

On a side note, I find it hysterical and fascinating that the pro business, deregulation at all cost "right" is now suddenly in favor of the employees rights not to be "coerced."

It's shocking that these principles are flying out of the window at the first sign of resistance. Shocking.

 

[Septic]

If they allow it, it will be the biggest government overreach in history.

Bigger than your kid being required to have a tdap to get into public school?

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Off to the Supreme Court we go! It was headed there anyway so let’s get this party started.

Not looking forward to this at all. Some of you guys are delusional if you think this is a slam dunk.

 

[whodeycin85]

See this is the problem with you guys, you don't even understand the argument that' being had. You keep shoehorning the word "force" into the conversation, literally no one is "forcing" anyone to get vaccinated.

If you don't want the vaccination, great - seek employment elsewhere. It's simply a condition of employment that isn't owed to anyone.

On a side note, I find it hysterical and fascinating that the pro business, deregulation at all cost "right" is now suddenly in favor of the employees rights not to be "coerced."

It's shocking that these principles are flying out of the window at the first sign of resistance. Shocking.

Do you feel its acceptable for 1 individual to have control over another?

 

[DynaLo]

The people making these decisions are the same ones who were taught that hiding under their desks would save them from dying during a nuclear attack when they were kids in school. I guess the mindset never changes.

Nah, we desk divers are all pushing 60 years old or older so this is happening to the grandkids that are beyond our decision making realm.

Unfortunately, our kids are the government brainwashed idiots without a spine doing this crap because of “believe the science” propaganda BS.

I told my eldest that we’re going to have some really serious issues happening if they do this jab crap to my grandkids. My kids are all grown and can protect themselves but I’ll do 3 hots/cot in a jumpsuit over my grand babies.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Bigger than your kid being required to have a tdap to get into public school?

If the state imposes that there is some precedent. But there’s zero basis for that Depends filling idiot in the WH to force this.