Vaccine or not?

#18,551
#18,551
Rasputin_Vol said:
He just has to defend them because "those are the rules"... or "those are the laws". Nevermind if the rules or laws make sense or if they are just wicked.
Click to expand...
Well I can't say anything bad about Ricky from a personal standpoint. After my mom fell in May 2020 and was taken to the hospital he helped me out knowing she was ok and doing good a couple of different times. Back then nobody could come in.

But to not operate on someone because of this experimental shot, which we know doesn't make a difference, is asinine to me.

From what we know now, seems like a regimen of Ivermectin the week before surgery, the week of surgery, and the week after surgery would be the standard in this situation, especially for someone needing a heart transplant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst, davethevol, VolinWayne and 3 others
#18,552
#18,552
Orange_Vol1321 said:
Well I can't say anything bad about Ricky from a personal standpoint. After my mom fell in May 2020 and was taken to the hospital he helped me out knowing she was ok and doing good a couple of different times. Back then nobody could come in.

But to not operate on someone because of this experimental shot, which we know doesn't make a difference, is asinine to me.

From what we know now, seems like a regimen of Ivermectin the week before surgery, the week of surgery, and the week after surgery would be the standard in this situation, especially for someone needing a heart transplant.
Click to expand...

I didn’t know this. This is solid. Props @Rickyvol77
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst, Orange_Vol1321 and Rickyvol77
#18,553
#18,553
Orange_Vol1321 said:
Well I can't say anything bad about Ricky from a personal standpoint. After my mom fell in May 2020 and was taken to the hospital he helped me out knowing she was ok and doing good a couple of different times. Back then nobody could come in.

But to not operate on someone because of this experimental shot, which we know doesn't make a difference, is asinine to me.

From what we know now, seems like a regimen of Ivermectin the week before surgery, the week of surgery, and the week after surgery would be the standard in this situation, especially for someone needing a heart transplant.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the kind words orange.hope your family is doing well
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst, InVOLuntary, davethevol and 2 others
#18,555
#18,555
luthervol said:
Sure it does.
How Effective Are COVID-19 Vaccines Against Omicron?
  • A two-shot course of mRNA vaccines or the one-shot J&J vaccine seem to be less effective against the Omicron variant, especially for infection.
  • Data so far indicates that mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) offer the most promising protection against both infection and hospitalization, in line with the CDC’s recommendations.
  • Current figures suggest that vaccines offer 30 to 40 percent protection against infection and around 70 percent protection against hospitalization without boosters.
  • Newer data is confirming that a third dose increases antibody production and boosts effectiveness against infection to around 75 percent, and 88 percent for severe disease.
Click to expand...
30 to 40 percent. By golly that's a guarentee you can take to the bank.

And remember this 30 to 70 percent is on top of what your body does already. It's not the only protection out there
 
#18,556
#18,556
Orange_Vol1321 said:
Well I can't say anything bad about Ricky from a personal standpoint. After my mom fell in May 2020 and was taken to the hospital he helped me out knowing she was ok and doing good a couple of different times. Back then nobody could come in.

But to not operate on someone because of this experimental shot, which we know doesn't make a difference, is asinine to me.

From what we know now, seems like a regimen of Ivermectin the week before surgery, the week of surgery, and the week after surgery would be the standard in this situation, especially for someone needing a heart transplant.
Click to expand...
Way to go @Rickyvol77
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst, InVOLuntary, NorthDallas40 and 2 others
#18,557
#18,557
NorthDallas40 said:
OSHA can’t take the L and walk away 😂

COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing ETS | Occupational Safety and Health Administration

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration is withdrawing the vaccination and testing emergency temporary standard issued on Nov. 5, 2021, to protect unvaccinated employees of large employers with 100 or more employees from workplace exposure to coronavirus. The withdrawal is effective January 26, 2022.

Although OSHA is withdrawing the vaccination and testing ETS as an enforceable emergency temporary standard, the agency is not withdrawing the ETS as a proposed rule. The agency is prioritizing its resources to focus on finalizing a permanent COVID-19 Healthcare Standard.
Click to expand...

They’re contradicting what ETS stands for.
 
#18,559
#18,559
luthervol said:
Sure it does.
How Effective Are COVID-19 Vaccines Against Omicron?
  • A two-shot course of mRNA vaccines or the one-shot J&J vaccine seem to be less effective against the Omicron variant, especially for infection.
  • Data so far indicates that mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) offer the most promising protection against both infection and hospitalization, in line with the CDC’s recommendations.
  • Current figures suggest that vaccines offer 30 to 40 percent protection against infection and around 70 percent protection against hospitalization without boosters.
  • Newer data is confirming that a third dose increases antibody production and boosts effectiveness against infection to around 75 percent, and 88 percent for severe disease.
Click to expand...

Guess we know which big pharma your government officials are investing in.
 
#18,561
#18,561
C-south said:
They’re contradicting what ETS stands for.
Click to expand...
Yep. “Well SCOTUS said our ETS is BS so we’re just gonna work to make it a rule!”

This “proposed rule” will die in committee as the SCOTUS rationale is pretty clear that this ETS exceeds their purview.
 
#18,564
#18,564
kiddiedoc said:
I sure am glad we're spending a bajillion dollars developing an Omicron shot since it will have completely run its course long before the shot is available.
Click to expand...
Perfect example of the problem that arises when people get to spend someone else's money. Yet leftists won't even look at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol, VolinWayne, DC_Vol and 1 other person
#18,574
#18,574
kiddiedoc said:
Maybe we can get it mandated, too, since everyone will have already cleared the virus. That way, we can all be safe and mask up and social distance and get free stimulus money.
Click to expand...
Oh they will.... until about August or September. Then it is 'declare victory over the virus' time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tntar heel
#18,575
#18,575
Rasputin_Vol said:
Is this medical misinformation? It only throws the cycle off one day? Interesting...

Click to expand...

Incorrect. Most women are not affected. The AVERAGE was one day longer over the entire study group. From the published article:

approximately 10% of these individuals experienced a clinically notable change in cycle length of 8 days or more
Click to expand...

This is a classic misrepresentation of findings that is obviously masking a much more profound effect on a minority of women.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top