Haha, my bad. Drunk posting doesn't always work out the best. 21 superior programs it is!
As far as those schools you mentioned... yea, people have rough patches. Tennessee is currently mired in one, as you mentioned, but is far from screwed. The Vols have, what, the #3 class at this point? Anyway... Miami, FSU, Oklahoma and Nebraska are clear cut better coaching gigs than UT. PSU is a given, though the scandal hurts, because of the fertile recruiting base.
SCAR and Clemson? That's all opinion, my position bolstered by their ridiculous recruiting base.
"Clear cut better coaching gigs," based on what empirical standard, the current status of the programs in question? If that is the case, we could just as easily cherrypick selected time periods when Tennessee was at its peak and other traditional powers were on a down cycle to claim the obverse of your assertion.
As a case in point, lets take at look at the first half of Fulmers tenure (1993-2001), a period during which Tennessees winning pct. was 5th in the nation, eclipsed only by Nebraska, Florida State, Marshall and Florida (see
I-A Winning Percentage 1993-2001). Among the programs that you claimed were clear cut better coaching gigs, Texas was 19th, Auburn was tied for 20th, Notre Dame was 22nd, Penn State was 24th, Georgia was 28th, UCLA was 32nd, Oklahoma was 33rd, USC was 36th, LSU was 38th, Clemson was 39th and the almighty Crimson Tide was a lowly 41st. I cite these data simply to demonstrate that, in my opinion, the best criteria for truly assessing the desirability of a given coaching position is long-term historical success, as opposed to a myopic what-have-you-done-in-the-last-five-years perspective.
Tennessee, admittedly, is a slow rebuilding process because of the historically weak instate recruiting base. When the program is humming, however, it is not hard to maintain because of its tradition.
With respect to Nebraska, Tennessee has more in common with that program than any of the other traditional powers. Nebraska's state population still has not eclipsed 2,000,000 and, unlike Oklahoma, they don't have the luxury of simply stepping across the Red River and raiding Texas for talent. They aren't likely to regularly reach the dizzying heights that they enjoyed in the old Big Eight/Twelve days. Given those circumstances, the powerhouse status which they achieved for decades on end was truly remarkable.
As for Oregon, they are unquestionably one of the nation's elite . . . for now. They were nothing more than mediocre until about the last 15 years or so. The same thing is most definitely true of South Carolina prior to Spurrier's tenure and almost certainly will be again after he is gone. The ten or so traditional powers are designated as such because they have achieved higher and more prolonged peaks and suffered shorter and less severe valleys.
Whether you want to admit it or not, Tennessee is one of those traditional powers and half of the programs that you cited as superior coaching positions are not. Your continuous sniping at Tennessee is not appreciated, particularly on a TENNESSEE MESSAGE BOARD, but you disingenuously hide behind the smug facade of objectivity.