bleedorange0037
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2007
- Messages
- 15,064
- Likes
- 1,665
No, superior in almost every way this year, next year, and the foreseeable future until UT does what it takes to get it's house in order.
According to your profile, you are 28 years old. Hell, you haven't even seen UT hit down stretches until now. They went 10 years starting in the mid 70's being average to bad until 1985. Vandy thought they were the sh*t in 1974 and 1975 with a tie and a win. They had 7 wins back then too similar to what they had this year with 8 with the extra game. I've seen this movie before.
Go ahead and think they have a superior program. I'll continue to laugh at that uninformed statement. People were saying Bama was never going to come back either. Typical overreaction from fans who haven't lived long enough to watch things go through cycles. UT will get things in order. Maybe you'll be back on the bandwagon then.
I'm not saying that Vandy has surpassed UT from an all time standpoint after 2 good years under Franklin. What I'm saying is that right now UT and Vandy's football programs are on opposite trajectories. Vandy is on the rise while UT has been nosediving and may not be done with that just yet. As of right now, Vanderbilt is a superior football team to ours in every way. That means on the field, on the sidelines and in the administration. They curbstomped us a month ago on the field, have a better coach and are crushing us in recruiting. Clearly that doesn't change what's happened in the past, but the past has no bearing on where each team is at the current moment.
I'm not saying that Vandy has surpassed UT from an all time standpoint after 2 good years under Franklin. What I'm saying is that right now UT and Vandy's football programs are on opposite trajectories. Vandy is on the rise while UT has been nosediving and may not be done with that just yet. As of right now, Vanderbilt is a superior football team to ours in every way. That means on the field, on the sidelines and in the administration. They curbstomped us a month ago on the field, have a better coach and are crushing us in recruiting. Clearly that doesn't change what's happened in the past, but the past has no bearing on where each team is at the current moment.
Vandy has the superior program this season. Once Franklin leaves (AKA, after next year) they'll be back to yearning for 6 win seasons.
Actually, they were favored to beat Northwestern and didn't. And they got curbstomped by UGA 48-3. They also had the benefit of playing Mizzou without their starting QB who they barely beat. Face it. Vandy won't have an easier schedule than this year and the best bowl they could get to was the Music City bowl.
I guarantee you that if UT had played Vandy's schedule and UT's best wins were over Ole Miss and NC State (who we actually beat) there would be more than a few that could look at that schedule rationally and say we still didn't really beat anyone. Since it's Vandy and they rarely beat anyone anyway, then everyone thinks they've done something. For them? Yes. For anyone else that has any kind of history? No.
Injuries are part of football. Northwestern is ranked 20 with a New Year's Day bowl win. Georgia is ranked #7 with two losses. Turn about: Vandy should have beaten USCe but the #10 Cocks were a little better. I agree It's Vandy but I give them some credit. We can agree to disagree.
Northwestern won ten games and would beat the **** out of UT. Vanderbilt is better than Tennessee. Repeat that into the mirror and hope that the Cincinnati coaching staff can change that fact.
Depends on when Northwestern would've played them. Only game that UT wasn't in the game (until after the Mizzou game when everyone knew Dooley's fate) was against Bama and they even had a chance in the 3rd qtr to make things interesting and turned the ball over. They played UGA and USC to the end. I think both of those teams are better than Northwestern.
UT has been down a few years. Vandy find's a niche, has some great senior talent, pulls in a competent coach, it's bound to happen every 25-35 years. Parity has hit DIV1 football much like free agency hit the NFL. High school players are being coached up and have resources much like colleges did 10 - 15 years ago. Add that to the 85 man roster and the SEC 25 schollie limit and you will find these traditional non-powerhouse schools taking some very good players that just don't make the cut at the bigger schools. I'm not dissing Vandy, hope they enjoy their short lived success. With that being said, UT is in the drivers seat with our new staff and we will have a good recruiting season. We have a very good roster lined up for 2013 and with the addition of a few studs, 2013 will be a good year. If things go right, it will be a great year leading up to a great recruiting season for 2014.
Depends on when Northwestern would've played them. Only game that UT wasn't in the game (until after the Mizzou game when everyone knew Dooley's fate) was against Bama and they even had a chance in the 3rd qtr to make things interesting and turned the ball over. They played UGA and USC to the end. I think both of those teams are better than Northwestern.
Derek Dooley would have lost. Trust me.
Your relentless "defense" of our season is much better than what was on the field. Sal should take notes from Orangeballs!
News flash - Northwestern is playing in a bowl game on national TV on New Years Day 2013. They beat a team (Vandy) that absolutely thrashed UT this year. How'd our (last several) season(s) end up again? Oh yeah - never mind. Just can't understand why there is some need on these boards to diminish the accomplishments of college kids that don't go to school in Knoxville. Makes us all look like small, jealous rednecks. Thanks for that. HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!!