The 16th Amendment was enacted in 1913. However prior to that...Can we move that ahead to about 1866?
Thanks,
The South
Of course there were taxes before 1861They weren’t present in this country until 1861. Next dumbass wrong statement?
Lol. Yeah. That’s like exactly like a federal income tax. We also had tariffs prior which largely paid for the government thus no need for an income tax.Of course there were taxes before 1861
The early Americans accumulated a lot of debt associated with the Revolution. The federal government assumed the debt of the colonies and sought to pay it off by taxing imports and imposing excise taxes on products such as alcohol, tobacco and refined sugar. Congress passed an excise tax on all distilled spirits in 1791, causing an uprising among farmer/distillers in the western part of Pennsylvania. The Whiskey Rebellion ended with President George Washington mobilizing 13,000 militiamen from multiple states and arresting 150 rebellious farmers. Only two were convicted of treason and they were later pardoned.
I said nothing about federal income taxes. I said taxes have been around since the beginning of societies. That is proper and it is justifiable. Who they taxed was always the issue. True then, true now.Lol. Yeah. That’s like exactly like a federal income tax. We also had tariffs prior which largely paid for the government thus no need for an income tax.
You were rationalizing an income tax you rube. And they did not exist prior to the date I listed. 100 years after the nation, and our society, had been formed.
And interestingly enough... the first income tax was required to finance war debt.
Nice deflection
The article said that they are protecting Maduro. So I would assume they are also in partial or maybe even full command of the state security forces and we know how the Russians operate. They may turn them completely loose on anti-regime protesters.
Cuba’s support and control over Maduro’s security and paramilitary forces are well known. 1/2
Any violence and intimidation against U.S. diplomatic personnel, Venezuela’s democratic leader, Juan Guiado, or the National Assembly itself would represent a grave assault on the rule of law and will be met with a significant response.
The big picture: The Trump administration's approach to foreign policy has quietly but fundamentally changed. Gone are those who often fiercely disagreed with Trump's instincts: Jim Mattis, Rex Tillerson, Gary Cohn and, at times, H.R. McMaster. Trump's new senior team — John Bolton, Mike Pompeo and Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan — backs his instincts on almost every issue. (Though, again, there are no signs they are pushing him towards a military action in Venezuela.)