VolsNSkinsFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 15,813
- Likes
- 3,974
My kid wanted me to tweet a pic of him (he's 3) to #risetothetop so they'd put it on the jumbotron. It wouldn't work and that was the stuff he cared about, not which QB was leading a more efficient attack.
My kid wanted me to tweet a pic of him (he's 3) to #risetothetop so they'd put it on the jumbotron. It wouldn't work and that was the stuff he cared about, not which QB was leading a more efficient attack.
It's also a giant concrete bowl and that doesn't help because the phone will hardly be able to get a signal because the signal is blocked by a giant concrete structure. Happen in every building on base because of the way they are built.
There's not really anything a carrier can do to give good cell service to a stadium of more than 40,000. It's just not possible with the technology that exits. The upgrades last year around Neyland for Verizion and AT&T users boosted capacity by 40x. But the networks were till overloaded because of data. The technology can't keep up with the usage.
Stadiums in downtown areas of major cities are better because they have multiple major downtown hubs that supplement the towers in and around the stadium. College stadiums, for the most part, don't have that luxury.
Carriers used to bring in a few mobile towers on trucks that would slightly alleviate the proble,, but now with how big data usage is, they really don't help.
The only thing that has been really helpful at stadiums is high capacity WiFi, which takes all the data users off the cell networks. While a pro team thinks nothing of dropping $3-4 million on a WiFi system that can handle 40,000 users, it's difficult for a school to spend that money. UT and other schools are looking into how to best upgrade without breaking the bank.
Ya know...I often wonder...are folks really as popular as they think...is the business gonna close because the owner went to the game?
I'm sure Cisco, Aruba, Verizon, Sprint, AT&T are looking for answers.
I was just happy to watch Vols playing baseball in Alaska.
Looking back, would I be willing to admit that I missed the Clint Stoerner fumble, because I was texting my friend to meet me at Calhouns after the game?
The average nationally televised game now has what, an hour of downtime now, thanks to all the TV timeouts? People are not bad fans because they expect to be able to text their friends about the game during all the interminable stoppages.
I don't really disagree. I barely care. We could or could not have a debate regarding how television has F'd up live sports.
If I want to go to Bonnaroo, I'm going for the music, I'm not going to interrupt my friends who could care less that I went. On the off chance that one of them cares, I'll tell them about U2 when I have a chance. It's not going to ruin my experience if I can't relate the price of the porta potty.
"Marlin Lane just scored to beat UF, wish you were here." I'm VFL #URNOT.
Not everyone uses messaging to send drivel to disinterested acquaintances. Last time I was in Neyland, I would have liked to be able text my wife during play stoppages, because she A) also cared intensely about the game, but B) she had to stay home and watch it by herself. Had Verizon's service not sucked, we could have in some small way felt like we watched that game together, even though I was in the stadium in Knoxville with my dad and she was stuck home with the kids in Atlanta. Instead she sat in a room by herself watching the game without talking to anyone for four hours. Maybe all you and your friends send each other from events is irrelevant blather, but that's not all everyone does.
"I really miss you honey...I'm in Neyland and not in the parking lot on the way to the hotel...Rajon Neal ran like a beast, if it's a boy WDYthink of Rajon?
"I tried to send a pic of the walking horse, here's what it used to be like before they got rid of the chains."
Tennessee just finished a three-phase, $130 million+ renovation to Neyland Stadium. Spending a lousy 2 or 3 percent to help with cell data coverage would have made far more of their customers happy than adding the club level. The idea that they can't afford it is laughable.