LordVOLdemort
Drive-By Expert
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2008
- Messages
- 10,293
- Likes
- 9,833
I'd have to re-watch, but it seems difficult to pinpoint our issues with that game as being defensive in nature. It's also difficult to imagine our best defender as being the issue defensively. My most glaring memory of JJJ was slipping on a wide-open breakaway that would have won the game in regulation.My argument was don’t attack a guy for being critical. And JJJ did struggle defensively in that game. It was obvious that night. As a whole, they did their thing, but he let a guy run right by him several times, no argument to that
Well I’ve been here WAAAAYYY longer than you so my opinion is better. It seemed petty to drum up a 3 month old thread after a loss to attack or mock a poster being critical.
Very true. It seems JJJ has finally figured it out though. He’s becoming a leaderI'd have to re-watch, but it seems difficult to pinpoint our issues with that game as being defensive in nature. It's also difficult to imagine our best defender as being the issue defensively. My most glaring memory of JJJ was slipping on a wide-open breakaway that would have won the game in regulation.
My argument was don’t attack a guy for being critical. And JJJ did struggle defensively in that game. It was obvious that night. As a whole, they did their thing, but he let a guy run right by him several times, no argument to that
Lighten up. “Attack with criticism”? Lol, saying something critical of a player’s performance in a sports forum is not an attack. That’s what’s wrong with society, ppl over exaggerating any perceived offense. I think the term used most regularly is “snowflake”.The premise you are defending is the issue. As a poster mentioned earlier, it is one of the problems with society in general. Let's not look at a big picture, body of work. Let's not reserve judgement and be patient in our assessments. Let's see one thing that didn't go well, this one time, and lets make the choice to attack it with criticism. And why, to what end do people do that? As a gotcha attempt to hope to sound smart when the assessment turns out to be true. How pitiful is that.
Lighten up. “Attack with criticism”? Lol, saying something critical of a player’s performance in a sports forum is not an attack. That’s what’s wrong with society, ppl over exaggerating any perceived offense. I think the term used most regularly is “snowflake”.
This was after the Texas tech game. Go back and watch the replay. Tell me Santi and JJJ both didn’t struggle that game on defense.
Easy to cherry pick 3 month old threads after a loss. My ex did that, too. Scroll months back to a text to prove a weak arse point.
I get it tho, easier to go through life in orange colored glasses
And that day was way back in December. Still, your point is very, very timely. Without Vescovi, this team would be dead in the water right about now and likely playing out the string. Tons of athletes out there and we've grabbed our share of 'em, but athleticism doesn't make you a shooter. Both Lofton and Vescovi are sneaky better athletes than given credit for being. Gimme basketball players who can shoot and make a damned layup. If they're athletic freaks, so much the better, but I saw a lot of athletes on the floor for South Carolina last night and none of them could do the one thing that wins you games....put the ball in the basket. That was painful to watch.OK, there's the stupid post of the day.
And that day was way back in December. Still, your point is very, very timely. Without Vescovi, this team would be dead in the water right about now and likely playing out the string. Tons of athletes out there and we've grabbed our share of 'em, but athleticism doesn't make you a shooter. Both Lofton and Vescovi are sneaky better athletes than given credit for being. Gimme basketball players who can shoot and make a damned layup. If they're athletic freaks, so much the better, but I saw a lot of athletes on the floor for South Carolina last night and none of them could do the one thing that wins you games....put the ball in the basket. That was painful to watch.
I made some comments early that I though his quickness issues were a liability, mostly in relation to the duties of a point guard. I also felt he lacked the athleticism that most SEC guards have. I think I said that I was not sure if he was the type of guard that could help us win an SEC title. I do think he’s a step slower than some SEC guards, but what he did overall far exceeded any perceived negatives. He has great anticipation, has a nose for the ball, uses the ball fake well, and hustles his guts out. His shooting % from 3 has become excellent compared to his first two years. Defensively, that guy gets in your grill more than any SEC player I know.
Vescovi came into the program with lots of excitement, but he often lost control. CRB & staff have really developed his skillset, & the quality recruits have only sharpened his development. Santi's work ethic & receptiveness to coaching have made him into a real weapon. Improvement has been impressive.