BigPapaVol
Wave yo hands in the aiya
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 63,225
- Likes
- 14
You can't say it this year either! You continue to get carried away by early season wins against poor opponents. We will know much more about this team after tomorrow night. At this point, I do not expect to win. Saying the SEC is better than the Big 10 is beyond stupid.
It is crazy how far apart we are when it comes to the Big 10!
Lets see,
Nova, Syracuse, UConn, Louisville, Notre Dame, Pitt, Cincy, West Virginia...
I think they may have taken a step back as a conference this year from last years incredible dominance but I still think they beat the Big 10 over and over in a head to head of best 10 versus.
I guess tonight you enjoyed Alabama beating Michigan?
Did you enjoy Florida beating Michigan State?
Did you like Minnesota losing to unranked Texas A&M?
Just wondering...
More SEC than Big Ten will be ranked...hmmm...lets look in the next few weeks.
Yes I am a Memphis fan, but also a realist. Do you not realize that in addition to our previous coach leaving and taking the #1 recruiting class with him, we also had our usual attrition from graduation and early NBA entry (a foreign concept on the Hill). Pastner has only 8 scholarship players, most of which were role players at best on the previous teams. In what logical universe should this team, even playing at home, beat a consensus Top 10 team?
As far as UT ever getting a shot at Pastner when BP leaves, keep dreaming. It would be a step down from where he is now. He, like Cal, would only leave for the ARizona job + any of the handful of Premiere jobs (UCLA, Duke, UNC, UK).
MHF, do you still honestly think that the SEC is better than the Big 10?
I have now watched a lot more of the Big 10 teams play and I would say if the SEC is better it is not by much. I would say that there is no way you can argue that the Big 10 is much better than the SEC.
I will use the updated standings and update my head to head guesses.
Also, your arguments lack consistency. Florida beats MSU and you use that as evidence that the SEC is better than the Big 10, but Illinois beats Clemson on their home floor and Clemson and the ACC are still better?
Wait are you saying that Illinois is better than Clemson?
Are you willing to say that Florida is better than Michigan State?
There will be plenty of evidence in the coming months as to whether I am right or you are right regarding the Big Ten being better than the SEC.
I watched the Florida MSU game and the Illinois Clemson game. MSU was not winning by 20 plus and then quit playing hard...
I think he is saying that your not using the same criteria to back up your arguments.
If in your mind, Florida beating Mich St makes the SEC greater than the Big ten.
then......
It should also mean that if Illinois beat Clemson that the Big Ten is by default better than the ACC.
This is the formula you are using (From what I can see). You use it to make your case for the SEC, but then disregard it when applying it to others.
As for the actual argument....
By no means do I think the SEC is better than the Big Ten, but I am not ready to jump out there and say the Big Ten is superior in any way to the SEC. Both have three teams in the top 25. Top to bottom, maybe the Big Ten has a few advantages. Its not a run-away win for either conference, and by the end of the year its probably a totally different story.
I've got to give props to MHF. Although I think he talks in circles alot, he has consistently tried to back up his side of the argument. He has made efforts to refrain from resorting to lame insults when someone disagrees with his opinion, such as "go kill yourself" or "go drink drano" and avoiding the topic altogether. He stands his ground, regardless of how shaky that ground may be.
With that said - MHF - I must agree with most of the other posters in this thread. Your argument is seriously flawed and you are running around in circles. You've got to use the same criteria across the board when comparing conferences or teams. Otherwise, you will get blasted, as already shown.