Subtle stylistic change has been part of Tennessee tradition. The strident advocates of black-on-black or black and white, with orange relegated to little more than an accent color, are advocating nothing less than a radical makeover.
I am a cultural anthropologist by training and my research focuses heavily on the role of style in material culture (yes, that includes clothing) as an expression of identity. You may not want to take my word for it, no matter how much academic research I cite as supporting documentation, but Butch Jones has said that you can walk into any high school in the country, clad in Tennessee regalia, and they know instantaneously who you represent. That is a profoundly strong, and accurate, example of the functional role of stylistic marker traits as an unequivocal expression of group identity. Personal experience further corroborates his position. On a return trip from Montana, I walked into the airport in Kalispell and a baggage handler spotted my Tennessee orange fleece jacket. Without my saying a word, he stated "you guys are a long way from home."
Few universities in the country have a more distinct color scheme than Tennessee. Make no mistake about it, radical change will, over time, weaken that association, both in terms of public perception and, more importantly, the Big Orange Nation. Frankly, I don't believe the strident advocates of black-on-black when they say that they are only advocating it for occasional usage. Oregon needed a gimmick, we don't. Oregon had no significant history of sustained success in football prior to the last decade or so. Therefore, a host of uniform combinations, ones that pushed the proverbial fashion envelope in college regalia, became a branding mechanism, one that set them apart as different before their onfield success really began to take root.
Either you have a problem with reading comprehension or you havent followed this thread for very long. There are plenty of contributors to this forum who have, indeed, advocated black-on-black or black and white, with orange relegated to little more than an accent color. Personally, I interpret their advocacy as code for replacement, not as an occasional alternative. On a personal note, are you sure that you want to debate the role of style in material culture as an expression of group identity with an anthropologist who specializes in its analysis? That would not be a particularly bright decision.
Just shut up already....most won't understand anything you just said....
I think not. When I read drivel of this magnitude, I am reminded of something one of my undergrad professors would say when challenged by a student who clearly lacked the intellectual firepower to engage him in debate: I will give credence to your opinion on this matter when you have a Ph.D. in this discipline.
Lol. Cody with the KO. Former and current players should have input on the uni's. We at least need to bring back the black accents and black shoes like we had when we were dominant in the late 90's. Black looks good with orange and white.Gosh your smart, your use of more words than necessary to convey a simple and rather unnecessary point is simply astounding.
P.s. look I did it too! Sadly I missed out on flaunting titles and qualifications..... Darn
OT: I like the idea of new uniforms, I can say for a fact that it plays a role in a players decision.
Gosh your smart, your use of more words than necessary to convey a simple and rather unnecessary point is simply astounding.
P.s. look I did it too! Sadly I missed out on flaunting titles and qualifications..... Darn
OT: I like the idea of new uniforms, I can say for a fact that it plays a role in a players decision.
I think not. When I read drivel of this magnitude, I am reminded of something one of my undergrad professors would say when challenged by a student who clearly lacked the intellectual firepower to engage him in debate: I will give credence to your opinion on this matter when you have a Ph.D. in this discipline.
While I respect your intelligence, whether you chose to throw it in everyone's face or not, I have to disagree with you.
I understand branding but don't believe (just my opinion) that adding temporary additions to our uniform does anything to damage our tradition, recognizability, or brand.
Some of the most recognizable brands in the world add certain design elements to their label every year for special occasions and I'm certain that people are able to find the product nor is anyone so turned off by it that they stop purchasing them. Coke and Pepsi change their cans, so do beer companies and I'm sure other major corporations do as well.
Just let go a little. It's not permanent. It's an ALTERNATE uniform. The schools official colors will not be changed and the name isn't going to be forgotten.
Who cares? As long as the players are happy and we win.Here's the thing though. If you give an inch, people will take a mile. First it's just a one time thing, then it becomes a yearly thing, then a couple times a year, and before you know it, UT is just running out there wearing a round robin of bull**** just like Oregon does every week and just like that UT's one of a kind, distinct look has all but been destroyed. It obviously won't happen with just one time (the black jerseys a few years ago didn't do it) but over time it most certainly could happen. IMO it's just better to not even go down that road.
Here's the thing though. If you give an inch, people will take a mile. First it's just a one time thing, then it becomes a yearly thing, then a couple times a year, and before you know it, UT is just running out there wearing a round robin of bull**** just like Oregon does every week and just like that UT's one of a kind, distinct look has all but been destroyed. It obviously won't happen with just one time (the black jerseys a few years ago didn't do it) but over time it most certainly could happen. IMO it's just better to not even go down that road.