Devo182
"Well Known Member" TWSS
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2015
- Messages
- 39,871
- Likes
- 138,001
Good post, you did educate me here. It is evident Chaney had talent in 2012. But, Scott and McClendon left in 2009. That was Chaney's second most productive year. So, maybe we can both agree Chaney was effective at OC in 2009 and 2012 when he had his most effective OLs. Tiny wasn't a starter until 2012 as a SOPHOMORE. I am not saying he wasn't good. But, MOST LINEMAN are definitely better their Junior and Senior years after two full years of S & C. Trey Smith and a few other ELITE ones are the exception to this rule. Fulton started in 2011 and 2012, Chaney's last two years. James was a starter as a FRESHMAN while Chaney was there in 2010 through 2012, James' Jr year. Basically, Chaney had at least 2 very good OLs the whole time he was there with 2012 being the best OL roster he had. That was his most productive year as an OC. I think Chaney did do more with less in 2009 and it isn't like we were terrible offensively in 2010, middle of the road. The offense was terrible in 2011. Since, you are the expert. Why was it terrible in 2011?
Bray and Hunter went down, though Rogers was great.
I was most concerned mr qb whisperer couldn't have Simms, as a Senior, ready to come in and be even midly competent. I'm concerned our offense was that 1-dimensional and reliant on a single players.
But I believe Bray still played UF and UGA and what did we score? 35 total points (17.5 ppg).
In total, minus Vandy, we scored 65 points vs 7 SEC opponents that year. That is just inexcusable, especially with a sr qb replacement.
Bray returns still banged up and we score 7 points?!
That season just showed how he didn't have a system that was plug and play. He needed talent or else he sank, as I've said all along.