newokie03
In Vino Veritas
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2012
- Messages
- 1,857
- Likes
- 3,335
This is a major rebuilding year for the Sooners (we were expecting an 8-4ish year) and instead we backed into a BCS bowl. We graduate 6 players that really matter (top 2 WRs is the real concern). We are more even with LSU than GA or SC right now. Next year, if we figure out which of the three headed monster at QB really deserves most of the snaps, we will be in the 4-team BCS playoff. I'm concerned about the Bama game because we are starting a lot of young linemen on both sides right now, and I think they might kill us by just running between the tackles over and over. I think we lose the Sugar Bowl about 31-14.
I have adopted the Vols as my second team, and have watched every game both teams played this year. I also watched Butch take his 2009 Cincy team and nearly upset us in Ohio, so he's familiar with what he's getting. But realistically, this game shouldn't be close. It won't look like this years Oregon game for UT but more like the Mizzou game. Something like 35-6, Oklahoma. Unless there's a big OU mistake, UT probably should not get in the end zone, and OU will have the ball for over 38 minutes is my guess.
This is a major rebuilding year for the Sooners (we were expecting an 8-4ish year) and instead we backed into a BCS bowl. We graduate 6 players that really matter (top 2 WRs is the real concern). We are more even with LSU than GA or SC right now. Next year, if we figure out which of the three headed monster at QB really deserves most of the snaps, we will be in the 4-team BCS playoff. I'm concerned about the Bama game because we are starting a lot of young linemen on both sides right now, and I think they might kill us by just running between the tackles over and over. I think we lose the Sugar Bowl about 31-14.
I have adopted the Vols as my second team, and have watched every game both teams played this year. I also watched Butch take his 2009 Cincy team and nearly upset us in Ohio, so he's familiar with what he's getting. But realistically, this game shouldn't be close. It won't look like this years Oregon game for UT but more like the Mizzou game. Something like 35-6, Oklahoma. Unless there's a big OU mistake, UT probably should not get in the end zone, and OU will have the ball for over 38 minutes is my guess.
Aren't you guys losing your #1 and #2 RBs on top of the starting TE and WRs? JMO but a team reloading like that shouldn't expect to realistically be in the Playoffs next year. Defense may be really good but too many question marks with both teams for me to say OU has, say, a 20 point advantage. Tennessee's strength will be in pass defense is exactly where you want your strength lie when you are facing an inexperienced offense. Beyond that, Tennessee gets a huge jump in the races with the addition of the (I know it's often talked) 14 early enrolees. The Run D could actually be decent next year for Tennessee, too, especially if AJ Johnson stays - which is very likely.
tl;dr I think it will be a decent match-up. I'm definitely driving to go see it.
Yeah, but we have Alabama-like freaks at the 3rd-5th RB positions this year, our TEs just block and catch 5 yard outs anyway (and we generally don't even use one except in short yardage or red zone formations, other than one weird run formation) and we always play 5-7 WRs in a game, so that's in some ways a non issue...the next two studs, whoever they are, are already on the field a lot now. This won't be an inexperienced offense, the question is Bell versus the speed burners at QB. If OU doesn't win by 28 it'll be because of the QB. The UT pass defense won't help much because we line up in a really wide spread and run the ball a lot of the time, and when we do pass, we try to isolate a WR versus an opposing LB. So unless AJ or the next WLB suddenly get really fast, OU will average 5-6 yds per carry and/or 15 per completion. Like I said, it won't look like Oregon, but the minor reload on offense doesn't matter in the BigXII like it does in the SEC because teams like OU and Baylor sub on offense like Kansas and NC do in basketball.
38 mins of possession! What a homer. I think you have been listening to big game Bob for too long if this how you expect things to turn out. Don't be dumb.
I don't disagree with that part - what I was trying to say is, on average, big 12 teams use a lot more WRs and RBs in a game than sec teams do. Alabama is of course an exception, largely because they can afford to do so because they have large leads a lot. In the SEC teams go 2 deep at those positions as a general strategy. In the big 12, several teams go 5-6 deep there per game by design.Reasonable, informative post. Kinda disagree with your last statement. The best SEC teams are the deepest and most talented in the country and rotate a lot of players, especially in the DL, to keep players fresh. For example, with the exception of QB, virtually every 2nd and in some cases 3rd string player for Alabama and LSU was as good as the starter. UT used to be this way.... it's been awhile.
Are they gonna be loaded next year or rebuilding ?how do they measure up against the vols? Ihave family in Norman and just wondering if yall think it could be a game we could win? Dont wanna make the long drive to watch us get blown out
Are they gonna be loaded next year or rebuilding ?how do they measure up against the vols? Ihave family in Norman and just wondering if yall think it could be a game we could win? Dont wanna make the long drive to watch us get blown out