hatvol96
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 49,979
- Likes
- 18
No, being an intentionally ignorant, provincial rube would disqualify her.
A country draws a good deal of its collective identity from the perceived intelligence of its leader. We've seen what having a drooling fool in office for eight years has done for the American psyche. Having another blissfully unaware imbecile in office would be less desirable than having an informed, yet ideologically flawed, person in the White House.Nope. Again you have failed to find something that would disqualify someone from doing a better job than the community organizing, rock star marketed, know nothing economist, political appointee nominating hypocrite, catchy slogan barking fool that currently inhabits 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
We might as well stop. Unless you can prove she is an inanimate object, I can't see the case for her being someone that could do worse than this guy.
A country draws a good deal of its collective identity from the perceived intelligence of its leader. We've seen what having a drooling fool in office for eight years has done for the American psyche. Having another blissfully unaware imbecile in office would be less desirable than having an informed, yet ideologically flawed, person in the White House.