DonjoVol
Sudoku Master
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2012
- Messages
- 6,332
- Likes
- 3,940
It's a fact. You embarrass yourself every single time you try and ridicule me over something lol. It's always over something minor and petty too.There it is! I knew I could drag it out of you if I mocked your ignorant ass enough Mrs Danth
Out of curiosity, I have some questions...They don't have to sit through some seminar put on by the VA. People can also access the MOS codes themselves online. However that doesn't give a full job description. A lot of it requires people getting out of this old outdated mindset that people coming out of the military need to be acclimated or need transition time. When in reality they are perfectly acclimated to take on responsibilities in the civilian world.
Here is an article for the Duke School of Business that will give you an insight on what I am talking about. This might help you a little in what I have been talking about. It is actually good to see a university such as Duke bring up this topic.Out of curiosity, I have some questions...
1) do you have any empirical data in this bias against vets or is this anecdotal?
2) why, either in your opinion or from what you've been told, do these hypothetically biased employers think there needs to be an acclimation period?
3) are you saying that the hypothetically biased employers won't hire vets at all or won't hire them for higher level positions?
My experience working with vets has been that they are like any other group, some are cut out for certain jobs and some are not.Here is an article for the Duke School of Business that will give you an insight on what I am talking about. This might help you a little in what I have been talking about. It is actually good to see a university such as Duke bring up this topic.
How Studying Biases About Veterans Could Help Improve Their Post-Military Careers
To answer number 2 a specific poster in this forum who claimed to work in talent acquisition stated that veterans needed an acclimation period. I disagree as many already have the necessary skills to move into a position based on their actual skills and should not have to take an entry level job to acclimate. Plus others have made the statements that veterans do not have the necessary skills. While it is true there are some positions that do not transfer over well into the civilian world, most positions in the military do.
I am saying many are not hired for positions based on the actual skills they have gained during their time in service. Which is why many end up switching to a totally different career. Or they are underemployed.
I would suggest watching the video that is included in the link I posted. It was actually a very interesting lecture. This guy has actually done research on the topic. About the 16:30 mark you will see what I'm talking about.My experience working with vets has been that they are like any other group, some are cut out for certain jobs and some are not.
I didn't dig deep into the links in the article you provided, but one link referenced what people emphasized on their resumes. That's not just a veteran issue. Many employers want a well rounded candidate. Perhaps some vets don't focus on their other activities as much as their job experience.
I haven't seen the post about nit hiring vets due to an "acclimation period," I'd have to know more about the context of the post.
I'm not invested in this enough to watch a video that long. I'll hire anybody, veteran or not, that I think is the best qualified. If they don't "acclimate" it can be dealt with...I would suggest watching the video that is included in the link I posted. It was actually a very interesting lecture. This guy has actually done research on the topic. About the 16:30 mark you will see what I'm talking about.
So I actually answered your questions, provide some evidence, and you refuse to read or listen to the video that is attached. I even gave you an exact minute mark you can start at in the video which is past the halfway point. This is why I don't like wasting much time on here with some of you fools. Guess since it's not on your preferred news network or isn't worth your time. What a complete tool you are.I'm not invested in this enough to watch a video that long. I'll hire anybody, veteran or not, that I think is the best qualified. If they don't "acclimate" it can be dealt with...
but see my edit anyway.
You don't need to call me a fool or a tool. I don't want to watch a video that I need to skip through 17 minutes of just to get to your point. There's plenty that could be said in that video you want me to skip that could inform the context of what you're directing me to. I'm not going to waste my time on it.So I actually answered your questions, provide some evidence, and you refuse to read or listen to the video that is attached. I even gave you an exact minute mark you can start at in the video which is past the halfway point. This is why I don't like wasting much time on here with some of you fools. Guess since it's not on your preferred news network or isn't worth your time. What a complete tool you are.
I respectfully answered your questions and provided what you asked for. It wasn't just something I wrote up. It is a link from Duke University. There is also a link from LinkedIn as well included. So if you are going to ask questions AND ask for evidence AND someone provides it perhaps you should learn to be an adult and be respectful in return. Or if you don't want to be called a tool or a fool then don't act like one.You don't need to call me a fool or a tool. I don't want to watch a video that I need to skip through 17 minutes of just to get to your point. There's plenty that could be said in that video you want me to skip that could inform the context of what you're directing me to. I'm not going to waste my time on it.
I don't know about you personally, but if this is a personal issue for you, your assumption that employers should "educate" themselves for you and your general attitude, as evidenced by your willingness to hurl insults, might have some impact on the impression that employers have of you.
He obviously got passed over for a promoYou don't need to call me a fool or a tool. I don't want to watch a video that I need to skip through 17 minutes of just to get to your point. There's plenty that could be said in that video you want me to skip that could inform the context of what you're directing me to. I'm not going to waste my time on it.
I don't know about you personally, but if this is a personal issue for you, your assumption that employers should "educate" themselves for you and your general attitude, as evidenced by your willingness to hurl insults, might have some impact on the impression that employers have of you.
LOL. It is way past your bedtime.He obviously got passed over for a promo
You provided a link to an article that made blanket statements with no statistics, and as evidence linked to other articles. Then you say, "watch the snippet of a video imbedded in my previous link that supports my claim." Seems to be a pattern where you want others to do your work for you, "research my qualifications, research my evidence for my claims."I respectfully answered your questions and provided what you asked for. It wasn't just something I wrote up. It is a link from Duke University. There is also a link from LinkedIn as well included. So if you are going to ask questions AND ask for evidence AND someone provides it perhaps you should learn to be an adult and be respectful in return. Or if you don't want to be called a tool or a fool then don't act like one.
I think what happened here is I provided some actual evidence along with some studies and you just don't like the answer I provided.
The evidence I provided is actually solid. Yours was not. The graph was simply an attack on Zero Hedge and provided no data to back it up. Plus I provided what Clark asked for and delivered. But that is the absolute last time I answer any question Clark asks.LMAO a link to a university is solid but a link to a research org staffed by university academics is “junk”. You’re an ignorant clown curly
The only reason it’s solid is because you like what it said. Just like zerohedge. That’s it curiy.The evidence I provided is actually solid. Yours was not. The graph was simply an attack on Zero Hedge and provided no data to back it up. Plus I provided what Clark asked for and delivered. But that is the absolute last time I answer any question Clark asks.
Now if you want to act like a grown adult and have adult conversations we can do that from here on out. Or you can continue acting like you are in junior high.
So I am going to post this article from Zero Hedge. Now kindly tell me what you find wrong with this exact article? Using your analysis and even opinion.
China Credit Growth Explodes To 4th Highest Ever In June... It's Still Not Enough | ZeroHedge
The evidence I provided is actually solid. Yours was not. The graph was simply an attack on Zero Hedge and provided no data to back it up. Plus I provided what Clark asked for and delivered. But that is the absolute last time I answer any question Clark asks.
Now if you want to act like a grown adult and have adult conversations we can do that from here on out. Or you can continue acting like you are in junior high.
So I am going to post this article from Zero Hedge. Now kindly tell me what you find wrong with this exact article? Using your analysis and even opinion.
China Credit Growth Explodes To 4th Highest Ever In June... It's Still Not Enough | ZeroHedge
In his feeble ass mind that is a rock solid irrefutable stance though. You’ve seen this stupidity unfold night after night from him.You provided a link that had no evidence other than links and stated no numbers, but just lead to other links. Like I said, if you go into a job interview saying the employer to do your homework for you, you aren't going to get far. Same concept. Sorry it upsets you.
Then I would suggest not asking someone to provide information that you are not going to bother reading. What it boils down to you is you did not expect me to provide anything to back up my claims. What you chose to do in response was flat out disrespectful. And now I know why a good portion of posters on here do not take you seriously with your claims of being "moderate".You provided a link that had no evidence other than links and stated no numbers, but just lead to other links. Like I said, if you go into a job interview saying the employer should do your homework for you, you aren't going to get far. Same concept. Sorry it upsets you.