That isn’t my assertion Larry. Just like Kyiv they wanted it and couldn’t have it. But they made it into Kharkiv only to get their asses ran out of town. Congrats on winning yet another argument nobody but you were havingSo either you agree with me that Russia never had Kharkiv....or...you're trolling, as usual?
So much for them purposefully avoiding civilians.I think Kharkiv will eventually be taken, if they want it (which I assume they do). I wouldn't say they had it a couple of months ago. They had a light presence outside the city that fell back to more defendable positions when Ukraine wanted to make a show of force for social media purposes. As I said at the time, there was no strategic purpose to this by Ukraine...you said they were trying to cut Russia's supply lines which I rightly laughed at. Shocker, they were never able to severe those lines. Now, as Russia has increased their forces around Kharkiv, they are back to surrounding the city and bombarding it on the daily.
The WesternDeathCult is at it again.
Considering you were laughing about Russia capturing all of them with some 10s of thousands over there waiting to be captured it's a failure. Maybe some 2000 got captured, I have seen as low as 200 and as high as 5000.They got some out, but waited way too late and took far more casualties than they needed to.
Reasons I believe your ratios are off, and I am not saying Monty's are right, I just take the middle ground because I dont trust either sides reporting:You want to try and attack credentials, because you can't attack the reasoning I gave. Why wouldn't, in the setup for the last few months, you expect high numbers of casualties for Ukraine? Why wouldn't you expect casualties ratio's to heavily favor Russia in this setup?
ButwhatabouttheUSinSyria!!!1!!11!!!Idlib Syria? I can't find Idlib in Ukraine.
Edit -
Russian jets bomb rebel-held Idlib in Syria, witnesses say