volgr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 7,760
- Likes
- 7,983
will of course they were so why even try. Let's just continue the same path of killing people and infrastructure that makes investors happyThe “ceasefire” Russia was always going to back out of because they never had any intention of peace at the time. Keep in mind, they are the ones who trashed the deal.
Then at least try. They're going to hurt Europe if no one tries a new approach. Until then the poorest still get the short strawThe only reason they have been discussing a ceasefire recently is because they know they’re struggling and want sanctions lifted so they can re-group and try again.
will of course they were so why even try. Let's just continue the same path of killing people and infrastructure that makes investors happy
Then at least try. They're going to hurt Europe if no one tries a new approach. Until then the poorest still get the short straw
Because there’s no room for compromise. One country wants to exist and the other country doesn’t think they should.will of course they were so why even try. Let's just continue the same path of killing people and infrastructure that makes investors happy
Then at least try. They're going to hurt Europe if no one tries a new approach. Until then the poorest still get the short straw
A more genuine comparison is if we just started invading Mexico and said it’s because Russia was threatening us without any sort of evidence, then began annexing and ethnically cleansing the territory.Expansion. If Russia was putting missiles on the Mexican border we would do the same. It's a purposeful provocation
Except your timeline is backwardsA more genuine comparison is if we just started invading Mexico and said it’s because Russia was threatening us without any sort of evidence, then began annexing and ethnically cleansing the territory.
But it isn’t. Russia had no real security concerns in Ukraine. They were just saying that. Ukraine was nowhere near being allowed into NATO. But they insisted on their independence and freedom to deal with the west economically. That, or course, is what is “hostile” to Russia.Except your timeline is backwards
The us has shown it has no issue with genocide. Not sure why you present it like a showstopper
As Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops into two rebel-held regions in eastern Ukraine late Monday night, recognizing the regions as independent, he returned to a familiar argument that the Kremlin has pushed for years: that Ukraine’s claim to statehood is entirely baseless. In a televised address to the nation, Putin explicitly denied that Ukraine had ever had “real statehood,” and said the country was an integral part of Russia’s “own history, culture, spiritual space.”
Putin’s speech, which went on for nearly an hour, was a new twist in the long-running battle to define Ukraine’s place in the world. In it, Putin set out his belief more forcefully than ever before that Ukraine is intrinsically Russian, that its three decades as a nation-state have been incoherent, and that the country owes its existence to a series of mistakes by bumbling Soviet leaders. (He made a series of similar arguments in an essay published last summer.)
False propaganda like the Russian claims they're fighting nazis?
Cease fire as was reported to have been on the table earlier. People don't want this in their country when it means losing everything they've ever had.