Electric Orange
𝓜𝓪𝓴𝓮 𝓐𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓡𝓸𝓬𝓴 𝓐𝓰𝓪𝓲𝓷
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2010
- Messages
- 21,080
- Likes
- 76,232
That's only 10 or 15% of world evil tops. Maybe 30, 35%ish if you include the other two. They deserve credit for good things too though. And evil isn't limited to any one group of people."Anglo" as in Anglo-Saxon - the people Ras blames for all the world's evils. Wait + Israel and the Saudis - don't think they are part of the anglosphere.
That's only 10 or 15% of world evil tops. Maybe 30, 35%ish if you include the other two. They deserve credit for good things too though. And evil isn't limited to any one group of people.
Democrats should've always supported most Republicans because they're on the same side. The uniparty has been in charge of our gov. for years.It's funny watching democrats support these Republicans like Bush, Bolton, Rick Wilson, Joe Scarborough and The Lincoln Project these days. Shows how bad their TDS is.
Hands down one of the worst votes I've ever cast for president, yet I'm sure so called conservatives will come to his defense and say he wasn't a bad president. He's a uniparty poster child.Yeah but I'm sure you remember what they were saying about Bush just 15 to 20 years ago. Now they love the guy.
The EU needs to be footing the entire bill. It‘s their dumbass decision to be energy dependent on Russia that gave Putin the funds for this fiasco. We shouldn’t be giving crap away.
So just to be clear... Russian leadership is incompetent for not expecting the US and UK leadership (the so-called paragons of virtue and leaders of the ruled based order) to not be honest brokers.
Let that s^^t sit in for a minute...
NATO is only a threat to Russia’s territorial ambitions.So to be clear... it is incompetence in your mind to not expect the US and UK to be honest brokers? Because for the past 30+ years, the UK and US has been telling Russia that NATO means no harm to them and that the Russians should trust them...
NATO is only a threat to Russia’s territorial ambitions.
If Putin expected the west to just let him take all of Ukraine with no consequences he may be intellectually impaired.
NATO is only a threat to Russia’s territorial ambitions.
If Putin expected the west to just let him take all of Ukraine with no consequences he may be intellectually impaired.
Neither do I but its been going on in our government for decades..at home and abroad. I'm allowed to spend millions in my agency as long as its not a minifridge or Leatherman for my employees. Thats where the buck stops with the federal government apparently. If Russia can show Ukraine is using money to buy those things, I bet the funds get clamped down on.I have no problem with some aid being sent to prevent Russia from annexing Ukrainian territory. I'm skeptical that this aid is going to where it's supposed to always. I don't support a decades long US financial commitment that has no oversight or way to determine the money is spent as advertised.
If the Russians want to kamikaze their military and reputation by getting their asses handed to them in a fight that they started, that's fine with me. Have at it. At some point though, Ukraine should be able to use all this help they're getting to finish off what some are saying is a nearly defeated Russia, which if true, should be soon.
Yeah I'm sure. Because if the federal government is good at one thing, it's knowing when to show some financial restraint.Neither do I but its been going on in our government for decades..at home and abroad. I'm allowed to spend millions in my agency as long as its not a minifridge or Leatherman for my employees. Thats where the buck stops with the federal government apparently. If Russia can show Ukraine is using money to buy those things, I bet the funds get clamped down on.
There is only one country that I know of that has used nuclear weapons in a conflict, and it was neither Russia/USSR or China.There is one major flaw in that thinking - at least to me. When a conflict involves Russia or China, it's not really local because both have the means to reach out and touch everybody with nuclear weapons. Waving a white flag and claiming not to be a part of it means nothing at that point. If helping in the fight, removes the toxic leadership, then it's a good fight. Reagan spent pretty freely militarily to bankrupt the Soviets; the Russians weren't smart enough to keep ex-Soviets out of power. Does supporting a country fighting Russia or China insure that they are less a menace to us and the rest of the world? Maybe not, but allowing them to take more land and more resources does mean they become a bigger menace with an expanded base to work from. Your stance would have meant that we should have not bothered to get involved in WW2 since in reality that was a European and an Asian problem if we hadn't intervened.
There is one major flaw in that thinking - at least to me. When a conflict involves Russia or China, it's not really local because both have the means to reach out and touch everybody with nuclear weapons. Waving a white flag and claiming not to be a part of it means nothing at that point. If helping in the fight, removes the toxic leadership, then it's a good fight. Reagan spent pretty freely militarily to bankrupt the Soviets; the Russians weren't smart enough to keep ex-Soviets out of power. Does supporting a country fighting Russia or China insure that they are less a menace to us and the rest of the world? Maybe not, but allowing them to take more land and more resources does mean they become a bigger menace with an expanded base to work from. Your stance would have meant that we should have not bothered to get involved in WW2 since in reality that was a European and an Asian problem if we hadn't intervened.
Hands down one of the worst votes I've ever cast for president, yet I'm sure so called conservatives will come to his defense and say he wasn't a bad president. He's a uniparty poster child.