NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,198
- Likes
- 83,313
You mean the Russian answer. Every single one of your points favors Russia only. This is why you pleas for diplomacy falls on deaf ears.The best answer was no NATO in Ukraine, a neutral status for Ukraine, Donbas remaining in Ukraine but having a certain level of autonomy and recognizing Crimea as part of the Russian Federation.
As I’ve called him out on when an R gets back in the WH (in 2024) he’ll immediately flip 180 and champion aid that will keep flowing. And it will keep flowing if Ukraine hasn’t fallen. There is no honest broker here it’s all party platform. When pointed out that war is here now what there are no answers.The Russians have found themselves bogged down in a US/NATO sponsored quagmire that will negatively affect them for years to come and may lead to the ouster of their President. It appears you as well as our "foreign enemies" may have miscalculated America's strengths and weaknesses.
Edit: I notice you never miss an opportunity to bash Biden. Some might suggest you suffer from..well.. BDS.
You mean the Russian answer. Every single one of your points favors Russia only. This is why you pleas for diplomacy falls on deaf ears.
There was no NATO in Ukraine, and still isnt or article 5 would have been called up. Ukraine was neutral, Russia didnt want to share which is why they bought off the president to sign a Russian deal.
It's about their choice.The pro war neocon and democrat crowd here in this thread do not care about the Ukrainian lives being lost daily. They have stated this on multiple occasions.
He says he wants an honest discussion. If no one offers he will just use the lack to claim some victory. This way he is repeatedly on record crawfishing from any real discussion.I still don’t know why you even offered him. You know it’s a waste of time. I won’t ever engage him on any serious detailed discussion he’s too much of a disingenuous troll and flat out liar to waste the time on.
Thanks for taking one for the team. Having engaged him before I’ll just refuse, point, and mock and laugh. Less stress and same end result.He says he wants an honest discussion. If no one offers he will just use the lack to claim some victory. This way he is repeatedly on record crawfishing from any real discussion.
It's no stress for me. Usually it just involves actually reading the stuff they post and realizing it doesnt say what they want it to say. Which is why they completely duck the subject after they get countered, and revert to deflection or personal attacks.Thanks for taking one for the team. Having engaged him behind I’ll just refuse, point, and mock and laugh. Less stress and same end result.
The same president that pardoned Mike Flynn?
Michael Flynn transcripts released, calls with Russian diplomat detailed