War in Ukraine

It's obvious that you have no clue what our military can actually do. Your namesake Putin does know, that is why he has gone out of his way to make sure that he doesn't give NATO a reason. Like I said, air superiority would come first and the hell would be unleashed. Lots of Ladas and potatoes would be passed out.
I know what we CANNOT do...

 
yes. that is what you are doing.

Giving weapons to Ukraine, so that they can defend themselves from a Russian invasion, is being a "warmonger"?

eye-roll-ugh.gif
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I have debated all that with you and others on this board. I am not rehashing and once again showing you where you are wrong.

You're in a death cult, there is no changing your mind.
you are in the same cult.

you would just rather they die in Russian slavery, rather than on the battlefield. What is the survival rate of those sent to Siberia? What is the survival rate of Ukrainians under Russian control? Even if you want to ignore the USSR, Russian control of the area still resulted in millions of dead. The only life saving on your part is FOR Russia, not for Ukraine, your end goal is transparent and its not to save Ukraine. and those same lives and more could be saved by Russia returning to its original borders.

Ukraine giving up in this war would just open themselves up to more Russian invasions later, they will be even weaker than they are, and it will also make them more dependent on western support, which you claim to be wholly against. but the only solution you parrot requires what you claim to be against. again your end goal is transparent, and its not save Ukrainians.

Ukraine lost ~10 million from the invasion itself. even if you believe they have lost 500k on the battlefield that is only 5% what they have lost to Russia. Getting back their land and their people is their only viable solution going forward to remain independent, from either side. Giving up insures servitude to one side or the other.
 
Giving weapons to Ukraine, so that they can defend themselves from a Russian invasion, is being a "warmonger"?

eye-roll-ugh.gif
if arguing that we shouldn't be giving them arms IS considered warmongering, then I would think actually facilitating war would ALSO be considered warmongering. you just don't mind because its the "right side" doing the warmongering in your scenario.
 
if arguing that we shouldn't be giving them arms IS considered warmongering, then I would think actually facilitating war would ALSO be considered warmongering. you just don't mind because its the "right side" doing the warmongering in your scenario.

So in your opinion,

"Giving a country weapons to defend themselves after they've been invaded"

Is the same thing as

"invading another country with the intention of killing or subjugating the people, and absorbing their terrioty into your own"?

You really believe that these are one in the same, and both fit the definition of being a "warmonger"?
 
So in your opinion,

"Giving a country weapons to defend themselves after they've been invaded"

Is the same thing as

"invading another country with the intention of killing or subjugating the people, and absorbing their terrioty into your own"?

You really believe that these are one in the same, and both fit the definition of being a "warmonger"?
You were the one who posted "warmonger" not me. take it up with your previous self, don't look to me to explain your terrible logic.
 
Weird, no mention of denazification, NATO encroachment, or protecting minority Russians. Nope, just talking about land grabs. Sorta what anybody with a brain (not @Rasputin_Vol) has been saying Russia was up to all along.


Just goes to show how desperate Russians are for indoor plumbing.
 
I know what we CANNOT do...

lol. Coast Guard ice breakers and they only have two.

Want to know why we only have two? Because we don't need to have them to get equipment from point A to point B.

The US can respond with its military anywhere in the world in 18 hours. Something Russia and China can't do.
 
lol. Coast Guard ice breakers and they only have two.

Want to know why we only have two? Because we don't need to have them to get equipment from point A to point B.

The US can respond with its military anywhere in the world in 18 hours. Something Russia and China can't do.
also we are playing 4D chess. Global Warming > Ice to be broken.
 

VN Store



Back
Top