tnmarktx
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,157
- Likes
- 4,803
I am a man of my word, I just know what my words mean before I use them. I am also a man who knows that slick Willy was pulling a fast one. not my fault you are naive and trust politicians.The US, UK and Russia gave its word to the Ukrainian people that if they gave up their nukes, each nation would ensure their security.
Fact.
Then Russia ignored that promise and invaded them.
Now we can either live up to our word that we'll ensure their security or simply renege on our word.
Clearly, you're not a man of your word. Instead you opt to joust in verbal semantics with your own ethically-devoid mind.
we have been hearing that Russia has been winning this whole time. Bakhmut was breaking Ukraine, once they finally got through Bakhmut it was all over. then the next and the next and the next.Who’s winning?
I am a man of my word, I just know what my words mean before I use them. I am also a man who knows that slick Willy was pulling a fast one. not my fault you are naive and trust politicians.
I have said it multiple times, I would absolutely support a situation where Article 5 is called in. The Memorandum doesn't have those same guarantees, and your own quotes have shown that, and instead of dealing with that you are making personal attacks, which shows you don't have a real argument.
the memorandum says we would support them. we have done that, word met. we have done too much imo. The memorandum doesn't spell out what is required in that support, so it is completely open to interpretation, blame our politicians, not me, I didn't write it.
That’s funny, this thread is packed full of people that have been saying that Ukraine is wiping the floor with Russia. Claiming that the money sent to Ukraine was the best money ever spent.we have been hearing that Russia has been winning this whole time. Bakhmut was breaking Ukraine, once they finally got through Bakhmut it was all over. then the next and the next and the next.
Russia has been days away from winning for more than 2 years now. at some point they have to produce if they want people want to believe them.
That’s funny, this thread is packed full of people that have been saying that Ukraine is wiping the floor with Russia. Claiming that the money sent to Ukraine was the best money ever spent.
Lol, who would have thought that a known Russian propaganda outlet like ZeroHedge would be calling for Ukraine to surrender to Russia, rather than for Russia to cease making war upon Ukraine?
Who’s winning?
Seems the US has now agreed to allow US weapons to hit within Russian proper territory.
Gloves are off.
at the start I was fine with the level of support. Not sure where exactly my line was, but it certainly became too much. I was already past my line, but one big example of things gone too far is when our politicians put a border policy on hold until Ukraine got funded.So your position is that you support our current level of support, yes?
I mean, that is what we said we'd do. So we're living up to that promise.
There's nothing left to debate here.
yes, and I have argued against them because they are wrong. but you are ignoring the multiple guys who have been in from the start proclaiming total Russian victory every time the Russians took the next stop sign.That’s funny, this thread is packed full of people that have been saying that Ukraine is wiping the floor with Russia. Claiming that the money sent to Ukraine was the best money ever spent.
You keep avoiding answering the question. There’s two combatants in this war. Who is getting the better of who?With your concept of "winning" in warfare, I'm sure you'd have thought Germany had won World War 2 when France surrendered in 1940.
Ukraine is killing Russian soldiers in large quantities, but Putin seems to be more than willing to trade Russian lives for any territorial gains, regardless of how small or tactically insignificant they are to his overall goal of subjugating all of Ukraine.
You keep avoiding answering the question. There’s two combatants in this war. Who is getting the better of who?
Still avoiding the question I see. The crow will still be available for as long as Ukraine doesn’t win this war.
So your actual real answer is that you support the suffering of the Ukrainian people, the wasting of American tax dollars, and the agenda of a corrupt uniparty gov.No, I just don't subscribe to your ultra-narrow interpretation of what "winning" during an active conflict means, due to a poor understanding of warfare in general
Putin's goal is for Ukraine to cease to exist as a sovereign nation, in 2.5 years of attempting to reach that goal, Russia has failed to do so, and Ukraine still exists.
So your actual real answer is that you support the suffering of the Ukrainian people, the wasting of American tax dollars, and the agenda of a corrupt uniparty gov.