LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 55,421
- Likes
- 55,547
the issue is that the Russia apologists use the exact same logic in their arguments. because the MSM said it once, it must be false.We need to examine the logic of the “Russian propaganda” argument. It wants to say and does say that if some opinion or fact x appears or has been alleged to ever have appeared in a Russian publication, that is prima facia evidence that x is false and also traitorous. And furthermore that the Russian publication is the only possible way that one might ever arrive at x.
A says x. But B once said x. Therefore A is lying.
This is not a valid argument.
It’s a completely illogical smear job and misinformation tool. If that is not immediately clear to someone, that is the use of examples. And keep in mind that the people who use this astoundingly illogical argument are employing it as a universal “truth” or tool. They apply it to anything and everything, as convenient. So a single counterexample shows the “Russian propaganda” argument to invalid.
Example 1. Russia Today said Obama was elected in 2008. Therefore Obama was not elected in 2008. Saying or believing that “Obama was elected in 2008” is spreading “Russian disinformation.”
Example 2. Russian Pravda said that an American spy plane was shot down over Russian territory during the Eisenhower administration. Therefore that is by definition false. Saying or believing that a spy plane was shot down (regardless of how the speaker arrived at his or her opinion) proves that the speaker is “spreading Russian propaganda.”
—-
Bonus from “power users” of the bad argument: Everyone who says x “must be a foreign national.”
President Eisenhower must be a foreign national.![]()
the Moskva was a great example of this. some pro-Ukrainian MSM broke the story of the Moskva being hit, the Russians immediately denied it, and kept denying it. for proof the russians used a video they took out of context. The media had shown a Russian ship on fire, the actual media people never claimed it was a current video, or even of the Moskva. but the Russian stooges had their "gotcha" clip of Ukrainian media talking about the Moskva while showing a video that wasn't the Moskva, ergo the Moskva was fine and it was all just misinformation. Several nicotine based theories later, even the Russians had to admit the Moskva was indeed having troubles. but never recanted their stance on the MSM lying.
its rampant on both sides. its been used multiple times in this thread "in war, truth is the first casualty".