85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 32,703
- Likes
- 64,403
are you asking who pays for the gas that flows through the nord stream? Nobody right now. Letters of credit are being issued because banks wont process payments to pay for the oil. So right now, Russia isn't making jack sh*t from EU domiciled banks.
Look, I'm all for cutting off Russia completely - just don't conflate the drip of money they're (theoretically supposed to be making) off of Nord Stream as a way to make up for the rest of the tidal wave of sanctions in the other direction.
Would you sing the same tune if another country seized Bezo's yacht because we bombed Syria?
1) We didn't go into their country and take it, it was here. They want to enjoy our benefits, they need to play by our rules, which is not invading other countries.Define influence. I am sure Bill Gates and other extremely wealthy people can get a word with the POTUS when they want. That too is influence. Hell our whole system of government is highly influenced by wealthy people and their donations.
What makes you think they invaded anything?1) We didn't go into their country and take it, it was here. They want to enjoy our benefits, they need to play by our rules, which is not invading other countries.
2. This invasion cannot stand. We're not going to physically fight it, but pretty much everything else is on the table.
1) We didn't go into their country and take it, it was here. They want to enjoy our benefits, they need to play by our rules, which is not invading other countries.
2. This invasion cannot stand. We're not going to physically fight it, but pretty much everything else is on the table.
Yachts are replaceable. The human lives lost as a result of the war that these oligarchs are funding aren't.
The EU council that has initiated sanctions against him has said that he has close ties to Putin and has been actively funding the conflict. Maybe they're just pulling that out of their rear end.
This is a very bad take. Imagine if Germany seized Bezos yacht or Bill Gates airplane while they were in German territory because they didn’t agree with what was happening in Afghanistan. And then their response was “your yacht and airplane are replaceable. Afghans are being killed.”
If he’s actively funding a conflict against a sovereign country, I don’t have a problem with it. Choices have consequences.This is a very bad take. Imagine if Germany seized Bezos yacht or Bill Gates airplane while they were in German territory because they didn’t agree with what was happening in Afghanistan. And then their response was “your yacht and airplane are replaceable. Afghans are being killed.”