War in Ukraine

#20,351
#20,351
volfanhill said:
Your explanation is terrible. Perhaps they are terrorizing them to surrender? Good lord. And did you forget that you presented and article as if it was preaching Russian restraint. But then the article says the opposite regarding everything outside the capital. That's my fault? Or did you not read it? Or are you bad at comprehension? Or did you get fooled? Come on be honest.
Click to expand...

The article doesnt say the opposite, you are evidently too thick to understand the nuance.
 
#20,352
#20,352
volgr said:
The article doesnt say the opposite, you are evidently too thick to understand the nuance.
Click to expand...
Lol. Ok man. Keep being an idiot. Your use of sources is the biggest joke I have ever seen. You not reading what they say is even funnier. How do you defend yourself. You didn't read what was said. You latched on to what you wanted to. They are destroying everything outside of certain areas.
 
#20,355
#20,355
OHvol40 said:
Bush is a borderline war criminal and set back American’s personal freedom and privacy to an unprecedented level. Bolton is nothing but a war hawk. Romney acts like he has a conscience, but falls right in line when he’s supposed to, he’s Charmin soft. McCain garnered some respect (deservedly so) but made more policy mistakes than progress. Biden is another useless career politician.

Be sure to check back in, though. Someday I might let you dictate my opinions to me… you can keep trying anyway.
Click to expand...
I mentioned democrats and you responded with the word "we". If you're not a Democrat then you shouldn't have responded with "we". And why are so many of you that ashamed to admit you voted for and supported Biden? You can still admit you voted for him even though he's a complete embarrassment and total failure.

Most people voted for Trump, which I did, or Biden. I highly doubt there's that many people on Volnation who voted for Jorgensen, Hawkins, Blankenship, La Riva, Kanye or any of the other third party or independent candidates considering they got less than 2% of the vote combined.

As far as guys like Bush, John Bolton and Joe Scarborough go. Yes they belong to you guys now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#20,356
#20,356
volfanhill said:
Lol. Ok man. Keep being an idiot. Your use of sources is the biggest joke I have ever seen. You not reading what they say is even funnier. How do you defend yourself. You didn't read what was said. You latched on to what you wanted to. They are destroying everything outside of certain areas.
Click to expand...
In all fairness, most people seem to latch on to what they want and follow sources they are going to agree with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#20,358
#20,358
DonjoVol said:
I mentioned democrats and you responded with the word "we". If you're not a Democrat then you shouldn't have responded with "we". And why are so many of you that ashamed to admit you voted for and supported Biden? You can still admit you voted for him even though he's a complete embarrassment and total failure.

Most people voted for Trump, which I did, or Biden. I highly doubt there's that many people on Volnation who voted for Jorgensen, Hawkins, Blankenship, La Riva, Kanye or any of the other third party or independent candidates considering they got less than 2% of the vote combined.

As far as guys like Bush, John Bolton and Joe Scarborough go. Yes they belong to you guys now.
Click to expand...

Feel free to look back and correct me if I’m wrong, but I never said I wasn’t a democrat nor did I say I didn’t vote for Biden, so your little rant is for not.

Just because Republicans supported bums then later figured out they were bums doesn’t mean that democrats accept the strays cast out from that currently aimless cult. Republicans put them in a position of power, live with it.
 
#20,361
#20,361
OHvol40 said:
Feel free to look back and correct me if I’m wrong, but I never said I wasn’t a democrat nor did I say I didn’t vote for Biden, so your little rant is for not.

Just because Republicans supported bums then later figured out they were bums doesn’t mean that democrats accept the strays cast out from that currently aimless cult. Republicans put them in a position of power, live with it.
Click to expand...
Oh let me guess. Anyone who is not a Democrat is a bum? I got it. And you have the audacity to claim the Republican Party is a cult. Yet democrats can't seem to form any original thought that hasn't been approved via their religious sermons on networks like CNN and The Young Turks.

You obviously don't pay attention. Your party has been praising Bush, McCain, Romney, John Bolton and the daughter of Dick Cheney these last 6 years. I bet the vast majority of John Bolton's book sales came from democrats. And they let Joe Scarborough have his own show on MSNBC where he gets to trot out some other neocons to keep that message alive mainly through your precious democrat party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and Rasputin_Vol
#20,363
#20,363
NYTimes:

...A U.S. official said Biden remained adamant about keeping U.S. forces out of Ukraine. But the official said the administration believed it would be misguided not to closely examine the thresholds, if any, under which the president would reverse himself, or to be prepared to deal with the consequences of the use of weapons of mass destruction.

A senior administration official said any use of a “small” tactical nuclear bomb by Russia — even inside Ukraine and not directed at a NATO member — would mean that “all bets are off” on the United States and NATO staying out of the war. But when pushed, the official declined to lay out the responses under discussion.

The official said American and NATO intelligence communities had not seen any activity by Russian military officials that suggested preparations to use a nuclear weapon. But he said that during internal discussions, administration officials were urging caution, because there was more at stake than just Ukraine...
 
#20,366
#20,366
volfanhill said:
He's the clown who thinks this is going exactly as Putin planned.
Click to expand...

You mean not capturing any major objectives and having your soldiers starving and running out of gas while failing to maintain air superiority wasn't planned?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#20,373
#20,373
UK doubles number of missiles sent to Ukraine ahead of Nato summit

...ahead of the summit, Johnson said the UK would provide 6,000 new defensive missiles, including high-explosive weapons, and £25m from Foreign Office funds to help Ukraine pay its military and police forces. Not all of the missiles are expected to be next-generation light anti-tank weapons (NLAWs) – of which the UK has already provided more than 4,200.

The additional weaponry means that the UK has now provided more than 10,000 missiles. It will be supplying Starstreak high-velocity anti-air missiles to help Ukrainians defend themselves against aerial bombings, as well as body armour, helmets and combat boots. But No 10 said it was hoped that international partners would also send weapons needed for longer-range targeting and intelligence.
 
#20,375
#20,375
Apparently the Russian ship that sunk in port was hit by a Tochka-U tactical ballistic missile.

There were 2 other identical ships in port that immediately set sail - one of them appeared to be on fire as it left, the other OK.

Pretty cool vid on the ships escaping.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top