I am not in favor of unregulated greed. As a libertarian, I generally also break issues into fundamental human rights on either side of the equation. (And lack thereof, by the way...)
In most cases, complaining about college football ticket prices and complaints of "F poor people" are short-sighted caricatures and extreme first world problems. The next question becomes, "What would you do about it, and what right do you have to anything about it?"
Is attendance to college football games an inherent right that we are all afforded? Would you balk at paying off student loans and then argue to give everyone a ticket to the college football game of their choice? How would you see it if you started a business and someone told you that they have a right to the product over and above your right to profits?
I have some bad news for the board. There are wealthy people and there are poor people. There will always be things some people can't afford. You can quip "So In guess it's F poor people" for any of these. But the next question will generally need to be, "what's your solution?" and the answer to most of these will be some form of "socialism" that puts the right of one person to partake over the right of others to charge (or the rights of the group/gov't to take from hard workers in the form of taxation for subsidies).
Here's a radical idea. If you can't afford a Porsche, don't buy one. If you can't afford college, go to trade school. If you can't afford to attend college football games, watch on TV. If you can't afford a TV and don't have friends who'd let you watch it with them, you may be the problem.
But at the end of the day, College Football game attendance isn't the same thing as coal miners dying in a shaft, and if you were going to offer a 'fix' that would allow people who can't afford attendance to attend, it'd probably be some form of socialism (as
@Jackcrevol alluded to).
Cheers, mate.