It is possible the staff wants to get through Spring ball to assess the current room to define our level of need and therefore our establishment of max value to offer at this and most rooms. It SEEMS to me that holding on to some big bucks for the May portal after you can establish a priority of needs on the field would be a smart play. Lack of progress and injury is what it is.
Some positions have higher potential for improvement through growth and development. IOL I would think would be high on that list and we have added a bunch of young bucks in the last cycle or two as we were coming out from under the NCAA hammer threat.
We just spent money on a much lower risk high end guy in Heard on the outside. He has a lower risk, but is still a risk. I still don't think using stars as a ceiling of ability is supported by draft days, the final analysis, but more for probability of high end production. Our staff is not blindly throwing darts at the 3 star pool and late breaking genetics is for sure in play for the big guys on both sides of the ball. We don't need to spend money to match what we WILL have in this room for the fall. I am HOPING the fact a group of our guys not getting nudged to the portal, like the DB room, means we still have some of them in play and we might better use our bucks elsewhere. That's my prayer and I am sticking to it.