Ya know, I'm starting to wonder if college football isn't changing when it comes to coaching hires. It seems you can hire a coach who "BECOMES" the program, as in it's the University of Kiffin, and the program is as good as the coach as long as the coach is there. OR you can build a program around a philosophy and hire coaches to the philosophy.
It just seems the transient nature of college coaches goes with the flash and done records as well. Look at USC they were very tough with Pete Carroll, they weren't that good before him and they haven't but that great since he left.
What do you guys think?