orangetd88
Agent of Chaos
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2003
- Messages
- 4,271
- Likes
- 475
Clint Stoerner stumbled and fell because Billy Ratliff drove the Arkansas guard (Burlsworth) back causing him to step on Stoerner's foot. The Vols won that game and I hate to see UT "fans" constantly apologizing for it.
This. Plus, if you look at the time out/field position situation, it is most likely that even if Stoerner doesn't fumble, we still get the ball back with around :50 left on the clock and only needing a field goal. A tough situation, but certainly not an impossible one.
Here are the stats for 1985.
Robinson 91/143 63.6% 1246 yds 8.7 yds/att 8td 7int
Dickey 85/131 64.9% 1161 yds 8.8 yds/att 10td 1int
He had a wealth of talent for sure, but he was capable of trying to do too much at times. That is the reason that he threw a fair number of interceptions. I saw him play every home game, and some others on TV.I'm not even close to attempting to knock Dickey--and your point earlier about the team pulling together is a great point.
However--the best QB at UT, and arguably the 2nd best QB to ever play at UT--is TR imho. :salute:
He had a wealth of talent for sure, but he was capable of trying to do too much at times. That is the reason that he threw a fair number of interceptions. I saw him play every home game, and some others on TV.
I don't disagree...but the level of competition--UCLA (#10), AUB (#1), FLA (#7), and BAMA (#15), compared to Dickey's may have something to do with those increased number of INTs...and the fact that Majors didn't allow Dickey throw the ball around....
Either way--there is no doubt that TR was more athletic, had a stronger arm, and gave the VOLS the best chance to win...
I doubt very seriously the outcomes of those first games with Dickey at QB....:salute:
I'm not going to argue the point that TRob wasn't the best qb that we had that year. If he hadn't been, he would have been on the bench and Dickey would have been the starter. I am saying that Dickey did a very commendable job as a backup, and you couldn't have asked for much more.I don't disagree...but the level of competition--UCLA (#10), AUB (#1), FLA (#7), and BAMA (#15), compared to Dickey's may have something to do with those increased number of INTs...and the fact that Majors didn't allow Dickey throw the ball around....
Either way--there is no doubt that TR was more athletic, had a stronger arm, and gave the VOLS the best chance to win...
I doubt very seriously the outcomes of those first games with Dickey at QB....:salute:
That Auburn team that was ranked #1 early in the season when we played them finished 8-4. Miami was #2 entering the Sugar Bowl at the end of the season. Georgia Tech finished #19. Also, Dickey played the last quarter of the Alabama game I think.I don't disagree...but the level of competition--UCLA (#10), AUB (#1), FLA (#7), and BAMA (#15), compared to Dickey's may have something to do with those increased number of INTs...and the fact that Majors didn't allow Dickey throw the ball around....
Either way--there is no doubt that TR was more athletic, had a stronger arm, and gave the VOLS the best chance to win...
I doubt very seriously the outcomes of those first games with Dickey at QB....:salute:
Tough to say. Very possibly, Phil Fulmer would have moved on to be head coach somewhere else. In some ways, losing to Arkansas and Carolina set us up for huge success for at least a decade.