Backwards K
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2012
- Messages
- 5,583
- Likes
- 5,199
Excellent rhetorical question/topic for discussion. My submission would be: what would the course of Tennessee football have been if Dickey had not responded to his alma maters call? Personally, I believe that he could have carved out a legacy comparable to Vince Dooleys: 250 career victories, a half-dozen SEC titles and, perhaps, a national title or two. We almost certainly would not have experienced the dark days of the mid-late 1970s and early 1980s, and Dickeys impact would have lessened the severity of Bear Bryants reign of terror in the 1970s.
I think that with T Rob, we tied UCLA and lost to Florida that year. With Dickey, we were 6-0-1.
Clint Stoerner stumbled and fell because Billy Ratliff drove the Arkansas guard (Burlsworth) back causing him to step on Stoerner's foot. The Vols won that game and I hate to see UT "fans" constantly apologizing for it.
Their stats were very similar with a slight edge to Dickey. I posted them earlier in this thread. I don't remember all the particulars, but I do remember that TRob had 8 tds and 7 int, and Dickey had 10 tds and only 1 int.Come on--do you REALLY believe we were a better team with Dickey at QB?
6-0-1 against GT (at home), Rutgers, Memphis, Ole Sis, Kentucky, Candy, and Miami...
We would have probably been 10-1-1 going into that Sugar Bowl with a legit shot at a NC after running off 8 straight wins--TR as a Heisman finalist--and momentum... :salute:
Their stats were very similar with a slight edge to Dickey. I posted them earlier in this thread. I don't remember all the particulars, but I do remember that TRob had 8 tds and 7 int, and Dickey had 10 tds and only 1 int.
I think that the rest of the team pulled together after robinson went down. I would be hard pressed to see how that team could have finished any stronger, no matter who was qb.
Here are the stats for 1985.Their stats were very similar with a slight edge to Dickey. I posted them earlier in this thread. I don't remember all the particulars, but I do remember that TRob had 8 tds and 7 int, and Dickey had 10 tds and only 1 int.
I think that the rest of the team pulled together after robinson went down. I would be hard pressed to see how that team could have finished any stronger, no matter who was qb.
We might also have gone into the Sugar Bowl thinking we were hot sh!t like Miami did, and got beaten. That team had something to prove .Come on--do you REALLY believe we were a better team with Dickey at QB?
6-0-1 against GT (at home), Rutgers, Memphis, Ole Sis, Kentucky, Candy, and Miami...
We would have probably been 10-1-1 going into that Sugar Bowl with a legit shot at a NC after running off 8 straight wins--TR as a Heisman finalist--and momentum... :salute:
What if we'd brought Majors back in '70 to replace Dickey instead of promoting Battle?
Posted via VolNation Mobile