hohenfelsvol
How uwe doo-in?!?
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
- Messages
- 50,392
- Likes
- 2,738
Yeah, vs Kentucky.....
Don't feel like defending Dooley again, but he did improve the roster quite a bit.
It certainly wasn't coach or recruit for needs.
It's been bothering me more on Georgia week. He wasn't a organizational manager. He wasn't a player's coach. He wasn't a football coach. Everyone says we have no talent and no depth. What did he do here?
If Kiffin was an atom bomb leaving radioactive decay in his wake, the Bamboo Farmer was the process of erosion. It doesnt look like it's doing much then one day, poof, the mountain is gone.
Forget Steve Spurrier. I think Vol fans have to strongly consider Vince and Barbara as the ultimate Vol Nemeses of the modern era.
Go Vols!
Don't think Dooley was bad as an "organizational manager." Rather, the real problem was that this was the only part of "being a CEO" that Dooley did well.
As a CEO of a private business, you have to sell people on a vision, motivate employees, manage people, organize your operations efficiently, make sure things run well, convince investors that you are building something worthwhile, prove your worth to the community, and eventually create financial returns. You also have to show people that you understand your industry well and that you are excellent at what you do. It's a tough job and being a college football coach is very similar.
Dooley was good at organization. With the exception of Sunseri, he seemed to have a reasonable understanding of coaching talent, as well. Consider that Justin Wilcox has been a pretty big success at UW, and Dooley managed to bring in Jay Graham and others.
But Dooley was a big fail on many of those other attributes. He never had a big vision. He wasn't a good game-day coach. He wasn't good at developing talent. He wasn't competent as a coach. He couldn't sell people on what he was "building." Eventually, the "investors" started to flee.
When Dooley lost Justin Wilcox, I think that was the beginning of the end. That was probably a direct result of the terrible season punctuated by one of the worst losses in program history (vs Kentucky).
Honestly, even Dooley's "poor recruiting" is more of a function of people losing confidence in him. He actually had a good track record as a recruiter elsewhere and did OK at first at UT. But once people lost confidence in him, it was over.
Butch Jones vs Dooley is like night-and-day. Jones knows how to develop talent. Jones has a long-term vision and is completely unwavering in selling it. Even if Butch went 5-7 this year, I still think he would be able to sell the future of the program. That doesn't mean that Butch will automatically succeed, but it certainly gives him much better odds.
Don't think Dooley was bad as an "organizational manager." Rather, the real problem was that this was the only part of "being a CEO" that Dooley did well.
As a CEO of a private business, you have to sell people on a vision, motivate employees, manage people, organize your operations efficiently, make sure things run well, convince investors that you are building something worthwhile, prove your worth to the community, and eventually create financial returns. You also have to show people that you understand your industry well and that you are excellent at what you do. It's a tough job and being a college football coach is very similar.
Dooley was good at organization. With the exception of Sunseri, he seemed to have a reasonable understanding of coaching talent, as well. Consider that Justin Wilcox has been a pretty big success at UW, and Dooley managed to bring in Jay Graham and others.
But Dooley was a big fail on many of those other attributes. He never had a big vision. He wasn't a good game-day coach. He wasn't good at developing talent. He wasn't competent as a coach. He couldn't sell people on what he was "building." Eventually, the "investors" started to flee.
When Dooley lost Justin Wilcox, I think that was the beginning of the end. That was probably a direct result of the terrible season punctuated by one of the worst losses in program history (vs Kentucky).
Honestly, even Dooley's "poor recruiting" is more of a function of people losing confidence in him. He actually had a good track record as a recruiter elsewhere and did OK at first at UT. But once people lost confidence in him, it was over.
Butch Jones vs Dooley is like night-and-day. Jones knows how to develop talent. Jones has a long-term vision and is completely unwavering in selling it. Even if Butch went 5-7 this year, I still think he would be able to sell the future of the program. That doesn't mean that Butch will automatically succeed, but it certainly gives him much better odds.
I know it probably is sacrilegious to disagree with some of you, but I don't think we blame Dooley for the lack of depth. Kiffin's class only had a few players left to finish their careers here. Then Dooley got about 45 days to scrap together a recruiting class his first year. Dools did some good things and some bad things. He was not ready to become head coach at an SEC program. His arrogance hurt him.
this program has been a complete clusterbleep since Fulmer's last years. Dooley took a bad situation and made it worse. these are just some bad bad times period.
Then how do you explain that his first class, the one he had to "scrap together" in 45 days was his highest ranked class? And every subsequent class was lower ranked, until the class he was putting together his last year here was behind Vanderbilt's?
Also, why would we blame the situation Dooley took over for a lack of depth now? Dooley had plenty of time to add depth.
It certainly wasn't coach or recruit for needs.
It's been bothering me more on Georgia week. He wasn't a organizational manager. He wasn't a player's coach. He wasn't a football coach. Everyone says we have no talent and no depth. What did he do here?
If Kiffin was an atom bomb leaving radioactive decay in his wake, the Bamboo Farmer was the process of erosion. It doesnt look like it's doing much then one day, poof, the mountain is gone.
Forget Steve Spurrier. I think Vol fans have to strongly consider Vince and Barbara as the ultimate Vol Nemeses of the modern era.
Go Vols!