A rising star leveraging a style of leadership that aligns with the needs of the current generation of players to produce a very good culture.So at this point in the CJH era, what does everyone think we have in him as a head coach?
Mild underperformance in year 1. Significant overachievement in year 2. Excellent developer of offensive talent. Outstanding schemer on O.When you look at him and his body of work so far, what do you see?
Not sure about the D. He has to delegate it a lot more and so far it has been unimpressive. I would give the O an A++ and the D a D so far.
Yes. For one the portal introduces a new degree of instability with most programs. A few here are convinced as I once was that the portal was the route to success. But instability isn't particularly good for a locker room or chemistry on the field. Frequently players leave their old team because they're the cancer looking for a new host. Heupel seems to be intent on building mostly from recruiting and then only bringing in portal players that mesh with the culture and provide benefit. He's not finding a ton of those guys... and that's fine.Do you see a coach that can bring conference championships and playoff berths to the program or do you see it different?
He took a bunch of players from the Island of Misfit Toys over the past two years and developed them into a team that won 10 games and was ranked #1 in the country for a brief period. He was one bad game with a roster depleted by injuries away from making the CFP. He is a championship caliber coach and based on what he did with the 19th most talented roster according to 247... I'm anxious to see what he does when they average around 10th.Personally what I see is a coach that has brought much needed stability and a healthy culture to the program. I see a coach that will consistently bring 8 to 9 wins a year with the occasional 10+ win season. And I see a coach that will have us in a decent to very good bowl game each year and for now, that's good enough!
Fulmer never stopped "winning" on NSD. I believe he had one recruiting class outside the top 25 in his entire tenure. Kiffin brought in a class that was liked by the recruiting sites. Dooley's classes averaged 13th. Jones' classes were even better- 21st, 5th, 5th, 15th, and 15th. Pruitt for all of his spots and flaws was 20th, 13th, and 8th.Up to this point the only thing I dont see in CJH is a dynamic recruiter that will consistently get us top 5 nationally which is what you absolutely need to have to contend for SEC conference titles. That's my only real concern going forward in the CJH era.
UT has had two problems. One is coaches that sucked at developing talent and were average on gameday or worse. Two is UT signed a lot of overrated players who never looked better than they did on NSD.
Heupel can coach with anyone on gameday. Heupel can develop talent. The remaining question is whether his "rebellion" against the recruiting "stars" is brilliant or stupid. Either "trusting their own evals" will lead to finding underrated players and avoiding overrated 4* guys... or the talent won't be there to win. There's not a ton of in between. UT took some players in this class with early commitments that the recruiting sites pretty much hate. Bussell, Bishop, Luttrell, Spillman, Robinson, Conyer, and maybe some of the others will make or break this class. Either UT found guys who will develop into high tier SEC players that no one else believed in... or lack of talent will eventually catch up with Heupel.
I have relatively high confidence based on Heupel's performance so far that he can do it. We will see.