tallvolball98
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,181
- Likes
- 540
Congratulations for your son. Is this son #1?
no. But as rome was built... You could see the results.. The growth... The expansion. You could see the steady progress. We saw none of that this year. If you disagree then please help me see what specific players or groups improved a tangible way that improved statistical results or wins.
No he didn't. He inherited a team with some deficiencies but a large group of talented sr's also. Nothing he inherited should have resulted in the debacle we've witnessed over the last 4 games. If there was "disarray" by this time... It was the direct result of this coaching staff.
But what is "disarray"? The program had struggled but it wasn't facing ncaa problems like '10. The roster problems were no worse than '10 and probably better. There were few if any big player discipline issues... That was not the case in '09 or '10. By jones' own testimony, this team and these seniors bought in fully.
So can you please define "disarray"?
Wow. I know some amway guys who would love to have your address.
That's interesting. They inherited a program that literally had no dt's... That didn't go two deep in live bodies on the ol. Both teams guys inherited one sec capable rb. Neither guy inherited a qb that was worth a dime. Both started lots of walk ons and fr. Neither inherited as many players who would enter the next nfl draft as jones did. Both inherited the residual effects of fulmer's lack of team and program discipline.
I don't have a problem with how he got the job. I have a problem with the way this team has been coached and the results.
What about them? Good coaches coach up their talent. If they have a little... If they have a lot... They coach it up. That is what i was looking for this season. I was looking for this ol to approach its promise... I was looking for the d to look like they knew where they were supposed to be on any given play. I wanted to see improvement in performance across the year. I full well accepted the fact that the roster had too many deficiencies to expect to beat bama or oregon.... But i did expect them to put up a little bit of a fight. I didn't expect them to win every game... But didn't expect them to lose to vandy either.
Show me. I'm not a native missourian but i live here now. Show me evidence of "rebuilding and remolding"... And don't give me crap about a recruiting class. Kiffin proved that any used car salesman can get recruits to sign.
Oh, you will. The experience will be gone. The developed talent for the most part will be gone. What you best hope for is that you see a totally different coaching staff from this year's with respect to development, gameplanning, strategy, corrections, and playcalling.
The boys about around the time of the vandy loss last year... Stood behind dooley and gang too. That doesn't mean a doggone thing.
Sorry. I would not have been so rough if i'd known you were a girl. :hi:
This coach isn't bringing back the same players.
The only thing i have seen that gives me any hope that things will get better next year is the possibility that he actually held guys back this year to develop them. Unfortunately... The lack of development and improvement with the guys who played makes me doubt this staff's ability to develop anyone.
LOL... Blame Dooley is about as valid as blame Bush. Dooley didn't coach this team and no one that I know of asked for the SEC championship. They were poorly coached. You can close your eyes to that all you like... It will still be true.SJT18:
Got to love you man, but this losing season started 3 years ago when Dooley gave us clydesdales in a league filled with race horses.
Bad comparison. Try comparing this team to Dooley's first one when he, his staff, and his team still believed that they could succeed. His team hung with the best teams on their schedule until depth, experience, and talent kicked in at half. This team was out of four of their losses well before halftime. So that fact is... as bad as Dooley ended... as correct as his firing was... he and his staff did a better job of coaching in '10 than this staff has done this year.All last year our team would fade to lose. This year they have hung tough in games that last year they would have gotten blown out in with the D and no O.
Why sure! That's it... Dooley called Jones and talked him into using a play not to lose strategy vs Vandy. THAT'S why they lost. It was Dooley that put Jancek up to not coaching the players to play their gaps and responsibilities. What on earth were any of us thinking by actually believing it was the job of the current staff to coach the current team and put them in the best position to be successful?That's the part that annoys me about all of this. Dooley failed those Seniors.
And then? Blown out by a Mizzou team with no more athleticism than UT has and likely significantly less. Blown out by Bama like they were and FCS school. Blown out by Auburn... by the greatest margin in the series history. Beaten by a Vandy team with the fraction of "speed and talent" that UT's roster has.If you wanted to see improvement rewatch the Florida game and then the Georgia and South Carolina games from earlier in the year. There was a lot of improvement from the team in those games and mainly it was at QB and WR.
We at least agree on that much. You can throw in the failure to have developed Dobbs over the last 3 months to be ready to step in.:hi:Coaches didn't have players ready, didn't scheme to get players in position to win, and didn't let QB go out and win it. THAT'S ON BUTCH AND HIS COACHES.
IMHO, if you are playing Vandy and the game hinges on one conversion, bad call, or botched trick play... the coaches haven't earned their pay.IMHO if you can't get 1 yard when you need it, you don't deserve to win!
I'm sorry. But I have been around and studied leadership of all sorts practically my whole life. Defeatism at this point is a reflection of the CURRENT staff's actions... not the last one. IMHO, he communicated that "play not to lose strategy" to this team effectively telling them that they weren't really good enough to beat Vandy... and disheartened them.They looked flat, listless, and uninspired and they looked more like a team that was resigned to their fate--another losing season than a team inspired and ready. ON BUTCH AGAIN. Hood even said as much in his interview the other day. That unfortunately is the culture that has infected the team now.
Then it is a coach's job to replace them... regardless of their seniority or anything else. THAT is something that does infect groups and if tolerated by the leader will spread like wildfire.You can try as hard as you want (b**ching, moaning, threatening, being sarcastic, guiding, ridiculing all of which Butch has tried), but sometimes you can't motivate players that don't want to be motivated.
The players and their failings can be blamed for part of it. They can't be blamed for poor development... playcalling... gameplanning....But I'm not going to crucify him over this year with these players who weren't taught those winning habits in the first place.
Next year though, if these same players and coaches are still looking like this team then I will.
"Wish Worley didn't get hurt so we'd be bowling."
This is what it means▲
LOL... Blame Dooley is about as valid as blame Bush. Dooley didn't coach this team and no one that I know of asked for the SEC championship. They were poorly coached. You can close your eyes to that all you like... It will still be true.
Bad comparison. Try comparing this team to Dooley's first one when he, his staff, and his team still believed that they could succeed. His team hung with the best teams on their schedule until depth, experience, and talent kicked in at half. This team was out of four of their losses well before halftime. So that fact is... as bad as Dooley ended... as correct as his firing was... he and his staff did a better job of coaching in '10 than this staff has done this year. Why sure! That's it... Dooley called Jones and talked him into using a play not to lose strategy vs Vandy. THAT'S why they lost. It was Dooley that put Jancek up to not coaching the players to play their gaps and responsibilities. What on earth were any of us thinking by actually believing it was the job of the current staff to coach the current team and put them in the best position to be successful?
And then? Blown out by a Mizzou team with no more athleticism than UT has and likely significantly less. Blown out by Bama like they were and FCS school. Blown out by Auburn... by the greatest margin in the series history. Beaten by a Vandy team with the fraction of "speed and talent" that UT's roster has.
We at least agree on that much. You can throw in the failure to have developed Dobbs over the last 3 months to be ready to step in.:hi:
IMHO, if you are playing Vandy and the game hinges on one conversion, bad call, or botched trick play... the coaches haven't earned their pay.
I'm sorry. But I have been around and studied leadership of all sorts practically my whole life. Defeatism at this point is a reflection of the CURRENT staff's actions... not the last one. IMHO, he communicated that "play not to lose strategy" to this team effectively telling them that they weren't really good enough to beat Vandy... and disheartened them.
Then it is a coach's job to replace them... regardless of their seniority or anything else. THAT is something that does infect groups and if tolerated by the leader will spread like wildfire.
The players and their failings can be blamed for part of it. They can't be blamed for poor development... playcalling... gameplanning....
Why wouldn't they? That losing attitude has been nothing but reinforced this year. The first time in more than 50 years UT has been beaten blown out by 28+ pts four times in a season. Another losing season that didn't have to be. A win over one good team that now looks far more like a fluke than a signature win. Lack of being prepared week after week. Lack of improvement and development. Most pts allowed in a game in 100 years. First back to back losses to Vandy since the Charleston was a popular dance... and potentially the first losses to UK and Vandy in the same season in decades and the first 8 loss season in school history.
If I am desperately looking for something positive to grab on to... I'm sure the players are too.
Who do you think Tenn. should do? Fire the coaches? Who would they get then for everybody to bash? No amount of money would get a Saban or a Miles. Butch Jones was about the only coach in major college football that wanted to come to this mess.