creekdipper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2014
- Messages
- 8,619
- Likes
- 23,187
It's felonious either way. Some of the time, the death penalty should be on the tableFrom the abstract of the link posted:
”the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual pedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1. This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually.”
That seems to contradict your conclusion. Admittedly, in total numbers, yes heterosexual pedophiles are greater than homosexuals, but heterosexuals, of course, far outnumber homosexuals.
How could I miss it? You’ve tried to make this embarrassingly stupid point 5 times now. Apple was a giant and Tim Cook was CEO long before he came out, so you’re just patting Republicans on the back for not having him immediately fired for being gay lol. Galaxy brain takes here
This sounds like you’ve been hitting your Bud Light tap pretty hard this afternoon.
Actually, I'm pointing out something very valid. You think the cultural narrative has duped the vast majority of the gay community.
If that's the case, you are assuming that you know something that 90% of that community doesn't.
No offense, but you don't strike me as someone who is more clever than 90% of people.
The Democratic narrative is that the Republican platform is to deny civil rights to a group that they feel they’re entitled to grab every vote. You’re a bunch of liars.
Have you got a copy of that documented platform you wish to share with everyone. Perhaps you can post a copy of the Republican Platform from 1984 1988 and 1992The Democratic narrative is that the Republican platform is to deny civil rights to a group that they feel they’re entitled to grab every vote. You’re a bunch of liars.
Pro same sex marriage, adoption rights for same sex couples, and other equal opportunity rights for homosexuals have always been issues proposed and passed by politicians of which political party?
All of these issues have been issues traditionally opposed by which party?
Perhaps it’s not fiscally responsible to extend marriage benefits to everybody that wants to claim they’re legal domestic groups. Should polygamists be allowed to claim dependents for 10 wives?
When the government subsidizes traditional marriages they’re encouraging replacement generations to be created.
It’s the extremes that the Left ALWAYS goes for that creates the pushback on legislation to create the special rights for LGBTetc.
Perhaps it’s not fiscally responsible to extend marriage benefits to everybody that wants to claim they’re legal domestic groups. Should polygamists be allowed to claim dependents for 10 wives?
When the government subsidizes traditional marriages they’re encouraging replacement generations to be created.
It’s the extremes that the Left ALWAYS goes for that creates the pushback on legislation to create the special rights for LGBTetc.
Perhaps it’s not fiscally responsible to extend marriage benefits to everybody that wants to claim they’re legal domestic groups. Should polygamists be allowed to claim dependents for 10 wives?
When the government subsidizes traditional marriages they’re encouraging replacement generations to be created.
It’s the extremes that the Left ALWAYS goes for that creates the pushback on legislation to create the special rights for LGBTetc.