marcusluvsvols
Blue collar skoller
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2012
- Messages
- 13,500
- Likes
- 22,986
The only way I like eggplant is in baba ghanoush. Preferably with roasted garlic.
The consenting adults thing is not the issue. It's the part about targeting children.
Good pivot. Your last bit proved a terrible failure for you.
A behavior that produces significantly higher rates of alcoholism, drug abuse, suicide, etc would make a good candidate for mental disorder. Unless I am unaware of the benefits to these outcomes.
How about we just learn? Is that not important? The point is the studies aren’t being done. Because people don’t want to see the results.
My belief is homosexual men certainly have shorter lifespans. I think most would believe that. There are even some studies that show it, but I don’t find a ton of info on this.
Currently we are saying, yea we know suicide, alcoholism, and drug abuse is higher among these people BUT WE ARE SURE it ks because they are ostracized. So we will just fix that part and watch how things improve once we fix that. That is quite the foolish approach. To go 100% in on one hypothesis to fixing a problem.
Rex
There are more important things to worry about (imo) than another persons sexual orientation. I have my religious stance, however, my opinion is not shared by everyone. If someone wants my view, then I will share it with them. My neighbor a few houses down from mine is an openly gay guy and is also a good friend of our family. The only major difference between us is his sexual preference (BFD). I would much rather have him over to my home instead of thieves or swindlers that you mentioned. If an openly gay person showed up at your congregation to attend church, how would that person be received? Warm welcome or condemnation? This is not meant as a personal attack but rather an honest question. I feel highly confident that an openly gay person would receive a warm welcome at the church I attend regardless of their lifestyle.
I'm just curious because it seems like one side has one understanding of what it means and the other side has another understanding.
Can we clarify what these terms mean so that we can move the discussion forward and have an honest dialogue?
From the abstract of the link posted:The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory study - PubMed (nih.gov)
You have a much larger problem with heterosexuals "targeting children."
And they even say that if the pedophilia is male to male that then attacker is still identifies heterosexual.. Doesn't matter sense to me..From the abstract of the link posted:
”the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual pedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1. This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually.”
That seems to contradict your conclusion. Admittedly, in total numbers, yes heterosexual pedophiles are greater than homosexuals, but heterosexuals, of course, far outnumber homosexuals.
Since you’re so smart you should be able to answer the question.
What are those favors exclusive to the straight, white Christians?
I do not blame you for immediately abandoning that extremely stupid "gay CEO" point
Not being slandered as a threat to mainstream society's precious women and children, which so far has been used against trans people, gay people, lesbians, Black people and undoubtedly just about every other minority group as well
Did you miss the part about the CEO of THE LARGEST COMPANY IN THE WORLD? Only the extremist Republicans (and Democrats for that matter) give a **** about who’s gay and in a position of leadership. Those aren’t the gay people that are performing sex shows for kids and riding parade floats in the middle of downtown streets while nearly naked.
And you comparing it to Obama getting the most votes is really stupid. CEOs are appointed by a powerful few. POTUS only needs enough of the voting population to buy in.