What is a Woman movie link

#76
#76
Highly doubt you will get a response. This question needs to be asked to every single democrat running for office going forward. It is a winning issue for the conservatives.
I don’t care if it is a winning issue for “conservatives”. You would likely be aghast over the results of my litmus test.

This is special treatment for a special group. We would never let other children consent to these procedures.

If you want to cut your arm off, then cut your arm off. I support your right to do so, you just gotta be 18.

If you believe 13 years olds should be able to cut their arm off if they choose - then lower the age of consent to 13.
 
#77
#77
The dichotomy you rely upon as between Dems and the GOP is symptomatic of why the GOP, as it has evolved to the current version, is doomed.

Dems focus in the big picture. Real problems, systemic ones, that hurt many people. Dems seek to advance the human condition.

The current version of the GOP is individualistic at too narrow a point. Indivualism has become personal. Selfish. So the GOP focuses on incredibly small problems, in the scheme of things. Issues which offend their individual sensibilities.

But that's not the future. It can't be.

Does frequency always matter? Or does frequency only matter here?
 
#78
#78
The dichotomy you rely upon as between Dems and the GOP is symptomatic of why the GOP, as it has evolved to the current version, is doomed.

Dems focus in the big picture. Real problems, systemic ones, that hurt many people. Dems seek to advance the human condition.

The current version of the GOP is individualistic at too narrow a point. Indivualism has become personal. Selfish. So the GOP focuses on incredibly small problems, in the scheme of things. Issues which offend their individual sensibilities.

But that's not the future. It can't be.

Holy hell that’s funny. Good one LG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLS INC. and AM64
#79
#79
That's why slippery slope doesn't work as an argument. Everything that didn't grow into a big trend started small, too.

That's true; not every spark becomes a fire. Common sense does prevail sometimes, and sometimes people are just not as easily amused, and sometimes things are quashed before they become dangerous. This nonsense on the other hand seems to have none of those elements working against it - common sense is out the window, the lunacy is reaching entertainment level, and governments are backing it - outright in some places and allowing it elsewhere.
 
#80
#80
The dichotomy you rely upon as between Dems and the GOP is symptomatic of why the GOP, as it has evolved to the current version, is doomed.

Dems focus in the big picture. Real problems, systemic ones, that hurt many people. Dems seek to advance the human condition.

The current version of the GOP is individualistic at too narrow a point. Indivualism has become personal. Selfish. So the GOP focuses on incredibly small problems, in the scheme of things. Issues which offend their individual sensibilities.

But that's not the future. It can't be.

Bravo. I don't think this guy could have wrote words any better ...

200.gif
 
#81
#81
The dichotomy you rely upon as between Dems and the GOP is symptomatic of why the GOP, as it has evolved to the current version, is doomed.

Dems focus in the big picture. Real problems, systemic ones, that hurt many people. Dems seek to advance the human condition.

The current version of the GOP is individualistic at too narrow a point. Indivualism has become personal. Selfish. So the GOP focuses on incredibly small problems, in the scheme of things. Issues which offend their individual sensibilities.

But that's not the future. It can't be.

Surely you can't really believe that bit of blather. Politicians will promote anything for a vote. Dems are using diversity like the GOP once used religion as a socially conservative base - they both take what the numbers give them. Dems run on convincing people that the GOP will steal their "rights", and the GOP does it's best to play the villain. Common sense doesn't even enter the equation.

One thing I do believe is that the GOP hurts itself in trying to be the adult or the parent when it comes to social issues. They'd be far better off undermining dems in a less conspicuous way than to tackle issues like this head on. I firmly believed that the SC gave the GOP a lightning rod with respect to the abortion ruling, and the GOP immediately went out running around with it in stormy weather. I'd imagine that cost the GOP congressional seats the last election. Better to recognize that battles are won not by a charge into a superior force, but by far more subtle strategies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#82
#82
FTR, 45% of dems outright oppose gender transition surgeries for minors. As a libertarian, it's a difficult question for me because I believe in freedom, and I don't claim to know what the right age is for people to make their own choices. I have just as much of a problem with this question as I do with minors marrying*. I mean, we got 16-year-olds marrying 40-year-olds and it's shocking and scary to me, just like irreversible gender transition is, but IDK what the answer is because I'm so hesitant to deny people freedom. Especially when science knows so little about what people with gender confusion are experiencing.

Most Americans support state laws banning sex change surgeries for minors, poll finds

According to this, only 34% of dems actually support hormone treatment and surgery for minors.

The “T” Piggybacking on the “LGB”

*and it's weird to me that the people who seem to care so much about grooming and pedophilia seem to have no problem at all with this. At the very least they're not making a stink about it. It doesn't even seem to be on their radar. I know people here will say "I'm against it." but the point is they're using tons of political capital to oppose a specific brand of grooming and ignoring the other, regardless of how they actually feel about it.

You are a sick and twisted individual
 
#84
#84
It’s cute that LG still trots out the R vs D debate. It’s so old. It’s uniparty vs the citizens now. The “battle lines” have shifted right in front of our eyes yet not everyone is seeing it.
 
#85
#85
So like 250 a year. That many people die in car accidents every day. Let's spend our time on public safety.
The Manson Family only killed about, what, maybe 20 people or so. By that logic the LAPD should have given them a pass and concentrated on reckless drivers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#86
#86
The Manson Family only killed about, what, maybe 20 people or so. By that logic the LAPD should have given them a pass and concentrated on reckless drivers.

Another crappy analogy from the right. I swear, you guys learned logic from the back of cereal boxes.
 
#88
#88
Another crappy analogy from the right. I swear, you guys learned logic from the back of cereal boxes.
Oatmeal is my go to carb. Luckily, the Quaker guy doesn't provide analogies. Is this your cereal of choice giving you so much wisdom?

1686156094552.png
 
#92
#92
Matt Walsh basically pulled a Borat on the tranny movement without the silly stuff and the left simply cant breathe.

The problem is society needed a giant fkn nerd like Matt Walsh to remind them of what a woman really is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#93
#93
Another crappy analogy from the right. I swear, you guys learned logic from the back of cereal boxes.
I'm hardly the right relative to most posters here. It was a crappy statement that I replied to. The point, as even you know, is that just because a problem does not directly affect huge numbers of people doesn't mean it doesn't need to be addressed.
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top