Volnanza
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
- Messages
- 966
- Likes
- 2,616
I like this (seeds not ranks) if Oregon, Georgia, and Clemson win:
1) Oregon
2) Georgia
3) Boise State
4) Clemson
5) Notre Dame
6) Texas
7a) Ohio State
7b) Tennessee
9) Penn State
10a) South Carolina
10b) Indiana
12) B12 champ
With the committee making a couple close decisions just to keep conference foes from playing each other in first 2 rounds.
We need Oregon to beat Penn St good. Then they probably drop behind us maybe. But we have to remember the big 10 committee calls these shots.Not really. In the event Oregon loses to Penn State in the Big 10 title game, Penn State will get auto bye, Oregon drops to the 5 seed....
We have no shot at the 5 so it would just be swapped with Penn State and Oregon loser
Penn State is not dropping past the 6 seed at all for losing to Oregon. I’d argue they wouldn’t drop past the 5th but that’s if the committee thinks Notre Dame has the 5 seed locked upWe need Oregon to beat Penn St good. Then they probably drop behind us maybe. But we have to remember the big 10 committee calls these shots.
They should have to ranked among the top 15. I can see years in the mountain west and outside the power 4 where we will be letting team in barely ranked in the top 25. Not talking about this year but there is a likelihood it could happen in the mountain west and other conferences outside the power 4. GBOThe auto bids were the only way to get the Big 12 and ACC to sign on to expansion. Those conferences are on life support.
3-4 have Big 10 ties, it was talked about on Finebaum who had the list. Big 10 has more influence on the board than the SEC no doubt about it. Your right most are from the west. Only 1 is from the sec. But they talked about how 3-4 of them had past ties to Big 10. Bottom line the 2 biggest conferences should have equal representation. And I think the committee needs a group of former coaches in it along with a few former players with great integrity. I would venture most of these committee folks never played or coached college football. GBOThe CFP committee has 13 members and only one of them is from the B1G.
Finebaum is an SEC reporter so of course he is going to push a biased narrative. I also have the list and the fact is that four of the committee members have SEC ties. I get that people like to get worked up about conference bias and media narratives but the facts show there is no more favoritism being shown toward or against a certain conference by the committee. It’s largely opinion and conjecture by fans - of all schools - who like to stir the pot by crying foul.3-4 have Big 10 ties, it was talked about on Finebaum who had the list. Big 10 has more influence on the board than the SEC no doubt about it. Your right most are from the west. Only 1 is from the sec. But they talked about how 3-4 of them had past ties to Big 10. Bottom line the 2 biggest conferences should have equal representation. And I think the committee needs a group of former coaches in it along with a few former players with great integrity. I would venture most of these committee folks never played or coached college football. GBO
I don’t think Georgia needs to be whipped. They lose by any margin and fall in seed by at least a couple of places.Vols most likely Opponent
OSU falls behind Vols and no more movement= 9-OSU @ 8-Vols
OSU doesnt fall behind Vols and no more movement= 9-Vols @ 8-OSU
Texas whips Dawgs OR Oregon whips Penn St.= 10-Indiana @ 7-Vols
Texas whips Dawgs AND Oregon whips Penn St.= 11-B12 winner @ 6-Vols
Whatever, if you can’t see the committee’s slant toward the big 10 I can’t make you see it. The top of big 10 has good teams but no doubt the sec is much deeper overall. The schedules overall aren’t comparable. It won’t matter in 2026 if the sec or big 10 don’t like this format it will change. I don’t care if we play on the road and kick their butt the victory will be just that much sweeter.Finebaum is an SEC reporter so of course he is going to push a biased narrative. I also have the list and the fact is that four of the committee members have SEC ties. I get that people like to get worked up about conference bias and media narratives but the facts show there is no more favoritism being shown toward or against a certain conference by the committee. It’s largely opinion and conjecture by fans - of all schools - who like to stir the pot by crying foul.