Joe Vols
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2010
- Messages
- 2,405
- Likes
- 503
I can see where the so called "NegaVols" are coming from. I used to be the first one calling out "negavol", but I've grown to appreciate the "show me the facts (success)" mentality.
I too would have to say this year has been unsuccessful so far. Did we expect it? Yes. Is it false to say this year has been unsuccessful? No. Poor play, questionable team participation, questionable play calling on both sides of the ball at times, 9-10-11 men on the field at times, the team looking under-prepared not just less athletic, Dooley's over the top pressers, mediocre recruiting class, and I'm sure I've missed some.
With that said I don't believe this year defines Derek Dooley as a coach as some do. I don't believe he'll go down in the history books as a bad recruiter or coach based on this year's results. I have decided to delay my assessment of him as a coach until 2012. This will be our first opportunity to see a seasoned Derek Dooley squad built almost entirely of his recruits. It will also be our first evidence of this coaching staff's ability to coach players to their potential. Until that time we will just be watching patch work football. By 2013 we'll all have a better understanding of what kind of coach Derek Dooley is and the direction he has our program headed, good or bad.
Until that time arrives I think the real question is:
What will we consider an acceptable year in 2012 for Dooley to get an extension? 8 wins and a bowl win, 9 wins and a bowl win? Neither, we need to give him 1 more year? Where do we draw the line? Because after our recent past (lack of success), to me this line is blurred. But as is all too familiar on Volnation this is just one man's opinion, it's not the gospel truth.
*Please, if you see a grammar or spelling mistakes in this post, point it out ot me in a respectful manner, and I will gladly correct it for you.
I too would have to say this year has been unsuccessful so far. Did we expect it? Yes. Is it false to say this year has been unsuccessful? No. Poor play, questionable team participation, questionable play calling on both sides of the ball at times, 9-10-11 men on the field at times, the team looking under-prepared not just less athletic, Dooley's over the top pressers, mediocre recruiting class, and I'm sure I've missed some.
With that said I don't believe this year defines Derek Dooley as a coach as some do. I don't believe he'll go down in the history books as a bad recruiter or coach based on this year's results. I have decided to delay my assessment of him as a coach until 2012. This will be our first opportunity to see a seasoned Derek Dooley squad built almost entirely of his recruits. It will also be our first evidence of this coaching staff's ability to coach players to their potential. Until that time we will just be watching patch work football. By 2013 we'll all have a better understanding of what kind of coach Derek Dooley is and the direction he has our program headed, good or bad.
Until that time arrives I think the real question is:
What will we consider an acceptable year in 2012 for Dooley to get an extension? 8 wins and a bowl win, 9 wins and a bowl win? Neither, we need to give him 1 more year? Where do we draw the line? Because after our recent past (lack of success), to me this line is blurred. But as is all too familiar on Volnation this is just one man's opinion, it's not the gospel truth.
*Please, if you see a grammar or spelling mistakes in this post, point it out ot me in a respectful manner, and I will gladly correct it for you.
Last edited: