What Will Happen with the Texas v. Pennsylvania Election Lawsuit @ SCOTUS

What Will Happen with the Texas v. Pennsylvania Election Lawsuit @ SCOTUS

  • SCOTUS Takes No Action - Does Not Hear The Case (Trump Loses)

    Votes: 34 75.6%

  • SCOTUS Hears The Case and Rules Against Texas (Trump Loses)

    Votes: 3 6.7%

  • SCOTUS Hears The Case and Rules Against Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and Georgia (Trump Wins)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • A Meteor Destroys the Earth Before Any of This Happens

    Votes: 8 17.8%
  • Total voters
    45
  • Poll closed .
#26
#26
GSD82 said:
Of course not because he has the best security in the world. Judges don’t. You all would murder any judge who overturned the election
Click to expand...


Love it.

Yet again, the proof you are right is that no rational person agrees with you. Really, just brilliant.
 
#30
#30
GSD82 said:
Whatever you dems need to tell yourselves
Click to expand...

Along with Dems don’t forget the Supreme Court, dozens of judges at this point, Trump’s own lawyers who have in many cases admitted that they’re not even alleging fraud
 
#32
#32
lawgator1 said:
Ooorrrrrrrr.... they are not going to hear it because its blatantly bogus nonsense.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't be surprised to see the Supreme Court tossing out votes after election day to make sure the current occupant retains power.

Of course, that's assuming we're talking about the Supreme Court of Belarus or Venezuela.
 
#36
#36
GSD82 said:
Of course there was
Click to expand...

You are correct. But not in the way you think you are - let’s all ruminate on the fact that in 2016 the president elect lost the popular vote by 3 million votes. In 2020 the president elect won the popular vote by 7 million votes. The electoral college margin was the same in both instances. The electoral college was created, in part, because our government determined that 18th century rural voters lacked the resources to make an informed decision as to who should be president. I can’t imagine trying to justify that as an argument in the 21st century.

Why not argue something substantive like this as opposed to embracing precipitous self-delusion?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJimgo and Lerxtwood
#38
#38
NorthDallas40 said:
I interpreted that as “we should hear it but we are not going to grant the relief requested” granted I’m not that great at dissecting lawyer speak and never care to be.
Click to expand...

The vote was 7-2; you are reading the dissent from Thomas and Alito who voted in favor. The motion is dismissed
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#39
#39
NorthDallas40 said:
I interpreted that as “we should hear it but we are not going to grant the relief requested” granted I’m not that great at dissecting lawyer speak and never care to be.
Click to expand...
canitpro said:
The vote was 7-2; you are reading the dissent from Thomas and Alito who voted in favor. The motion is dismissed
Click to expand...
Just to clarify:
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#40
#40
canitpro said:
The vote was 7-2; you are reading the dissent from Thomas and Alito who voted in favor. The motion is dismissed
Click to expand...
I realize the motion is dismissed and never questioned that. I don’t remember seeing a statement that was a dissenting opinion (even though it reads like one) and somebody even said it was 9-0. If it was 7-2 as you say and those to dissented then that makes a lot more sense
 
#42
#42
davethevol said:
They won’t hear it because of the risk of the fallout even if it has merit. It would tear this country apart even more.
Click to expand...
No, they didn’t hear it because it had zero merit. Frivolous last ditch effort that ended up in the toilet where it belonged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#45
#45
GSD82 said:
I don’t want you communists to agree with me
Click to expand...
. I guess if you aren’t a wingnut Fascist then you’re a Communist right? Ever heard the term “moderate”? Your takes are just ridiculous and I suspect you’re just trolling for attention. There are plenty of moderates around like me who just turned on your boy and sent him packing. And if the Republicans don’t get back to the center, the same thing is going to happen in 2024. They’ll hand it to the Dems just like this year.
 
#46
#46
I’m guessing there are a lot of Dems that believe ACB, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are all of a sudden qualified. I will say, I trust their judgement here.
 
#47
#47
NorthDallas40 said:
Ok then yes 7-2 with Thomas and Alito dissenting in saying they should hear it. Thanks.
Click to expand...


No. Thomas and Alito dissented on hearing the case. They felt SCOTUS should hear it. But they made clear they too would deny based on merits. So 9-0 is Ok to say basically. There are copies of the written result in Presendenti
 
#48
#48
Delmar said:
. I guess if you aren’t a wingnut Fascist then you’re a Communist right? Ever heard the term “moderate”? Your takes are just ridiculous and I suspect you’re just trolling for attention. There are plenty of moderates around like me who just turned on your boy and sent him packing. And if the Republicans don’t get back to the center, the same thing is going to happen in 2024. They’ll hand it to the Dems just like this year.
Click to expand...

the Republicans did get back to the center- they just call themselves the Democratic Party now. Thanks Bill Clinton

Would love to discuss the “moderate” comment. In order to moderate, wouldn’t policy or at least ideology need to exist on a compatible continuum? What areas of policy even remain between the two parties that can be watered down into moderation? Infrastructure? Even that seems dead on the floor every time it comes up for vote
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJimgo
#49
#49
PointGuard said:
No. Thomas and Alito dissented on hearing the case. They felt SCOTUS should hear it. But they made clear they too would deny based on merits. So 9-0 is Ok to say basically. There are copies of the written result in Presendenti
Click to expand...
No... it’s 7-2. Thomas and Alito said they should hear it the rest said they shouldn’t. That’s it. There is no 9-0 people are taking liberties with that. When it was first announced and I read it that’s what I thought but then of course in the victory lap here they stated a bunch of misleading crap.
 
#50
#50
Delmar said:
. I guess if you aren’t a wingnut Fascist then you’re a Communist right? Ever heard the term “moderate”? Your takes are just ridiculous and I suspect you’re just trolling for attention. There are plenty of moderates around like me who just turned on your boy and sent him packing. And if the Republicans don’t get back to the center, the same thing is going to happen in 2024. They’ll hand it to the Dems just like this year.
Click to expand...
You aren’t a moderate you all are radical communists
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top