NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 56,736
- Likes
- 82,425
Sarcasm? I’d say he’s a pretty solid man of conviction and Ive agreed with him much more than I have disagreed with him
So that’s my point I figured this was already a preset play and I’d guess there are a few more.How long between the ruling and him releasing what he clearly knew would be a controversial and factually inaccurate statement? I especially love when you see these statements that espouse wrongdoing in the name of the constitution without providing any specifics or citing what in the constitution is being transgressed. It’s certainly not out of character for him to be an opportunist
In other words until they let democrats pick our candidates, you enjoy socialism and communism so we don’t want youNot even worth the trouble to debate the likes of you. I know my record in 50 years of voting and that is for reasonable minds. Something that is missing from the Republican Party these days. Until they move back to the middle, they’ve lost me.
The ejection rule was legally adhered to. Trump was legally ejected.The purpose wasn’t to overturn an election. The purpose was to force the ejection rules to be legally adhered to. If the outcome is an overturned Biden win, then an actual fraud would be exposed. Both parties should want vote counting to be correct.
The ejection rule was legally adhered to. Trump was legally ejected.
Except that our very own luther said they want Trump removed by any means necessary.The purpose wasn’t to overturn an election. The purpose was to force the ejection rules to be legally adhered to. If the outcome is an overturned Biden win, then an actual fraud would be exposed. Both parties should want vote counting to be correct.